MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.09.004

Медицинская библиотека · The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2023

Robot-navigated pedicle screw insertion can reduce intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stay: analysis of 1,633 patients utilizing propensity score matching.

Asada Tomoyuki, Simon Chad Z, Lu Amy Z, Adida Samuel, Dupont Marcel, Parel Philip M, Zhang Joshua, Bhargava Satyaj, Morse Kyle W, Dowdell James E, Iyer Sravisht, Qureshi Sheeraz A

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Navigation and robotic technologies have emerged as an alternative option to conventional freehand techniques for pedicle screw insertion. However, the effectiveness of these technologies in reducing the perioperative complications of spinal fusion surgery remains limited due to the small cohort size in the existing literature.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether utilization of robotically navigated pedicle screw insertion can reduce the perioperative complications of spinal fusion surgery-including reoperations-with a sizeable cohort.

STUDY

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent primary lumbar fusion surgery between 2019 and 2022.

OUTCOME MEASURES: Perioperative complications including readmission, reoperation, its reasons, estimated blood loss, operative time, and length of hospital stay.

METHODS

Patients' data were collected including age, sex, race, body mass index, upper-instrumented vertebra, lower-instrumented vertebra, number of screws inserted, and primary procedure name. Patients were classified into the following two groups: freehand group and robot group. The variable-ratio greedy matching was utilized to create the matched cohorts by propensity score and compared the outcomes between the two group.

RESULTS

A total of 1,633 patients who underwent primary instrumented spinal lumbar fusion surgery were initially identified (freehand 1,286; robot 347). After variable ratio matching was performed with age, sex, body mass index, fused levels, and upper instrumented vertebrae level, 694 patients in the freehand group and 347 patients in robot groups were selected. The robot group showed less estimated blood loss (418.9±398.9 vs 199.2±239.6 ml; p<.001), shorter LOS (4.1±3.1 vs 3.2±3.0 days; p<.001) and similar operative time (212.5 vs 222.0 minutes; p=.151). Otherwise, there was no significant difference in readmission rate (3.6% vs 2.6%; p=.498), reoperation rate (3.2% vs 2.6%; p=.498), and screw malposition requiring reoperation (five cases, 0.7% vs one case, 0.3%; p=1.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative complications requiring readmission and reoperation were similar between fluoroscopy guided freehand and robotic surgery. Robot-guided pedicle screw insertion can enhance surgical efficiency by reducing intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stay without extending operative time.

Для цитирования: Asada Tomoyuki, Simon Chad Z, Lu Amy Z, Adida Samuel, Dupont Marcel, Parel Philip M, Zhang Joshua, Bhargava Satyaj, Morse Kyle W, Dowdell James E, Iyer Sravisht, Qureshi Sheeraz A. Robot-navigated pedicle screw insertion can reduce intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stay: analysis of 1,633 patients utilizing propensity score matching.. The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.09.004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.