MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3340/jkns.2014.55.2.83

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2014

Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with restless legs syndrome in spine clinic.

Yang Jin Seo, Cho Yong Jun, Kang Suk Hyung, Choi Hyuk Jai

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common disorder affecting up to 5% to 15% of the general population, in which the incidence increases with age, and includes paresthesia in the legs. The purpose of this study is to investigate the incidence of RLS in spine center and to review clinical manifestations of this syndrome and its current treatments.

METHODS

Over a period of a year, retrospective medical record review and lumbar magnetic resonance images were performed on 32 patients with RLS in spine clinic who were diagnosed by National Institutes of Health criteria. Affected limbs were classified as five. Two grading systems were used in the evaluation of neural compromises.

RESULTS

The incidence of RLS was 5.00% (32/639). There were 16 males (50%) and 16 females (50%). The median age at diagnosis was 55.4 years (range, 25-93 years). There are no correlation between the affected limbs of RLS and neural compromises on the lumbar spine.

CONCLUSION

The RLS is a clearly common neurologic disorder of the limbs, usually the legs. The awareness of this syndrome can help reduce diagnostic error; thereby, avoiding the morbidity and expense associated with unnecessary studies or inappropriate treatments in RLS patients.

Для цитирования: Yang Jin Seo, Cho Yong Jun, Kang Suk Hyung, Choi Hyuk Jai. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with restless legs syndrome in spine clinic.. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society. 2014. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2014.55.2.83.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.