Biomechanical Study of Horizontal Screw-screw Crosslink in C1-2 Pedicle Screw-rod Fixation.

STUDY

DESIGN

This is a biomechanical study in vitro.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the biomechanical differences between horizontal rod-rod crosslink (hR-R CL) and the horizontal screw-screw crosslink (hS-S CL) implementation in C1-2 pedicle screw-rod (C1-2 PSR) fixation.

SUMMARY OF

BACKGROUND

To improve internal fixation stability, transverse connector (TC) is used in C1-2 PSR to increase torsional stiffness. The connection mode of horizontal connection includes hR-R CL and hS-S CL. hS-S CL adopted in C1-2 PSR was rarely reported and its biomechanics are still unclear.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Six fresh cadaveric cervical spine specimens were each tested as an Intact model, then modified and tested as an Instability model (unstable odontoid fractures), and then as 3 internal fixation models, including C1-2 PSR, C1-2 pedicle screw-rod+horizontal rod-rod crosslink (C1-2 PSR+ hR-R CL), C1-2 pedicle screw-rod+horizontal screw-screw crosslink (C1-2 PSR+ hS-S CL). The ROM of the C1-2 segments was measured by applying 1.5 nm load in 6 loading conditions, including flexion-extension (FE), left and right lateral bending (LB), and left and right axial rotation (AR).

RESULTS

The C1-2 PSR+hR-R CL and C1-2 PSR+hS-S CL models, respectively, showed 60% and 75% lower ROM than the C1-2 PSR model in LB and AR conditions ( P <0.05). ROM was comparable between the C1-2 PSR+hR-R CL and the C1-2 PSR+hS-S CL models in all loading conditions ( P >0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both types of crosslinks showed superior C1-2 stability under LB and AR conditions than PSR without crosslinks. The C1-2 segment stability was comparable between the 2 types of crosslinks themselves.