MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/brs.0000000000004812

Медицинская библиотека · Spine · 2023

In Vivo Comparison of Positive Microbial Culture by Wound Irrigation Methods: Biportal Endoscopic Versus Open Microscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Kang Min-Seok, You Ki-Han, Hwang Jae-Yeun, Cho Tack-Geun, Yoon Joon-Hyeok, Lee Chong-Suh, Park Hyun-Jin

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors and prevalence of intraoperative contamination (IoC) through the microbial culture of superficial and deep samples obtained during surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical site infection (SSI) in spinal surgery is a serious complication. The prevalence of IoC may differ based on surgical approach and technique, even in the setting of the same procedure.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

In this in vivo study, microbial cultivation was performed with superficial (ligamentum flavum, LF) and deep (nucleus pulposus, NP) surgical specimens to evaluate IoC in 132 patients undergoing single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Biportal endoscopic -TLIF was performed under continuous wound irrigation (group A, n=66), whereas open microscopic (OM) TLIF was performed under intermittent wound irrigation (group B, n=66). LF and NP specimens were homogenized, gram stained, and cultured in aerobic and anaerobic media for 14 days. Microbial culture results and the occurrence of SSI in the two groups were assessed. The χ 2 test and Fisher exact test were used to determine significant differences among categorical variables. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the influence of patient characteristics on the prevalence of positive microbial cultures.

RESULTS

Of the 132 patients, 34 (25.8%) had positive microbial cultures, and positive culture required an incubation period of 72 hours to 2 weeks in all these patients except for three. Overall, positive culture was significantly higher in group B than in group A ( P =0.029). The subgroups of LF- and NP-positive cultures were 18.18% (n=24) and 12.88% (n=17), respectively; the SSI was 0.76% (n=1). Group A had a significantly lower subgroup of NP-positive culture than group B ( P =0.035). OM technique was an independent risk factor associated with overall positive culture ( P <0.05). The most common microorganism was Cutibacterium acnes ( C. acnes ).

CONCLUSIONS

Biportal endoscopic-TLIF with continuous wound irrigation showed significantly lower overall and NP-positive cultures than OM-TLIF with intermittent irrigation. The most common strain of positive culture was C. acnes .

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Для цитирования: Kang Min-Seok, You Ki-Han, Hwang Jae-Yeun, Cho Tack-Geun, Yoon Joon-Hyeok, Lee Chong-Suh, Park Hyun-Jin. In Vivo Comparison of Positive Microbial Culture by Wound Irrigation Methods: Biportal Endoscopic Versus Open Microscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.. Spine. 2023. DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004812.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.