Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024
How to customize common data models for rare diseases: an OMOP-based implementation and lessons learned.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ahmadi Najia, Zoch Michele, Guengoeze Oya, Facchinello Carlo, Mondorf Antonia, Stratmann Katharina, Musleh Khader, Erasmus Hans-Peter, Tchertov Jana, Gebler Richard, Schaaf Jannik, Frischen Lena S, Nasirian Azadeh, Dai Jiabin, Henke Elisa, Tremblay Douglas, Srisuwananukorn Andrew, Bornhäuser Martin, Röllig Christoph, Eckardt Jan-Niklas, Middeke Jan Moritz, Wolfien Markus, Sedlmayr Martin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Given the geographical sparsity of Rare Diseases (RDs), assembling a cohort is often a challenging task. Common data models (CDM) can harmonize disparate sources of data that can be the basis of decision support systems and artificial intelligence-based studies, leading to new insights in the field. This work is sought to support the design of large-scale multi-center studies for rare diseases.
METHODS: In an interdisciplinary group, we derived a list of elements of RDs in three medical domains (endocrinology, gastroenterology, and pneumonology) according to specialist knowledge and clinical guidelines in an iterative process. We then defined a RDs data structure that matched all our data elements and built Extract, Transform, Load (ETL) processes to transfer the structure to a joint CDM. To ensure interoperability of our developed CDM and its subsequent usage for further RDs domains, we ultimately mapped it to Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) CDM. We then included a fourth domain, hematology, as a proof-of-concept and mapped an acute myeloid leukemia (AML) dataset to the developed CDM.
RESULTS: We have developed an OMOP-based rare diseases common data model (RD-CDM) using data elements from the three domains (endocrinology, gastroenterology, and pneumonology) and tested the CDM using data from the hematology domain. The total study cohort included 61,697 patients. After aligning our modules with those of Medical Informatics Initiative (MII) Core Dataset (CDS) modules, we leveraged its ETL process. This facilitated the seamless transfer of demographic information, diagnoses, procedures, laboratory results, and medication modules from our RD-CDM to the OMOP. For the phenotypes and genotypes, we developed a second ETL process. We finally derived lessons learned for customizing our RD-CDM for different RDs.
DISCUSSION: This work can serve as a blueprint for other domains as its modularized structure could be extended towards novel data types. An interdisciplinary group of stakeholders that are actively supporting the project's progress is necessary to reach a comprehensive CDM.
CONCLUSION: The customized data structure related to our RD-CDM can be used to perform multi-center studies to test data-driven hypotheses on a larger scale and take advantage of the analytical tools offered by the OHDSI community.
METHODS: In an interdisciplinary group, we derived a list of elements of RDs in three medical domains (endocrinology, gastroenterology, and pneumonology) according to specialist knowledge and clinical guidelines in an iterative process. We then defined a RDs data structure that matched all our data elements and built Extract, Transform, Load (ETL) processes to transfer the structure to a joint CDM. To ensure interoperability of our developed CDM and its subsequent usage for further RDs domains, we ultimately mapped it to Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) CDM. We then included a fourth domain, hematology, as a proof-of-concept and mapped an acute myeloid leukemia (AML) dataset to the developed CDM.
RESULTS: We have developed an OMOP-based rare diseases common data model (RD-CDM) using data elements from the three domains (endocrinology, gastroenterology, and pneumonology) and tested the CDM using data from the hematology domain. The total study cohort included 61,697 patients. After aligning our modules with those of Medical Informatics Initiative (MII) Core Dataset (CDS) modules, we leveraged its ETL process. This facilitated the seamless transfer of demographic information, diagnoses, procedures, laboratory results, and medication modules from our RD-CDM to the OMOP. For the phenotypes and genotypes, we developed a second ETL process. We finally derived lessons learned for customizing our RD-CDM for different RDs.
DISCUSSION: This work can serve as a blueprint for other domains as its modularized structure could be extended towards novel data types. An interdisciplinary group of stakeholders that are actively supporting the project's progress is necessary to reach a comprehensive CDM.
CONCLUSION: The customized data structure related to our RD-CDM can be used to perform multi-center studies to test data-driven hypotheses on a larger scale and take advantage of the analytical tools offered by the OHDSI community.