MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/0974-2700.66519

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock · 2010

Developing a clinically relevant classification to predict mortality in severe leptospirosis.

Rajapakse Senaka, Rodrigo Chaturaka, Haniffa Rashan

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Severe leptospirosis requires critical care and has a high mortality. We reviewed the literature to identify factors predicting mortality, and such predictors were classified according to the predisposition, infection, response, organ dysfunction (PIRO) concept, which is a risk stratification model used in severe sepsis.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

PUBMED was searched for all articles (English), with the key word leptospirosis in any field, within the last 20 years. Data were collected from 45 relevant papers and grouped into each component of the PIRO model.

RESULTS

THE FOLLOWING CORRELATED WITH INCREASED MORTALITY: predisposition - increasing age and chronic alcoholism; infection - leptospiraemic burden; response - hemodynamic disturbances, leukocytosis; organ dysfunction - multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, pulmonary involvement and acute renal failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research is needed to identify the role of infecting serovars, clinical signs, inflammatory markers, cytokines and evidence of hepatic dysfunction as prognostic indicators. It is hoped that this paper will be an initiative to create a staging system for severity of leptospirosis based on the PIRO model with an added component for treatment-related predictors.

Для цитирования: Rajapakse Senaka, Rodrigo Chaturaka, Haniffa Rashan. Developing a clinically relevant classification to predict mortality in severe leptospirosis.. Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock. 2010. DOI: 10.4103/0974-2700.66519.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.