MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212878

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2018

Comparison of individually tailored versus fixed-schedule rituximab regimen to maintain ANCA-associated vasculitis remission: results of a multicentre, randomised controlled, phase III trial (MAINRITSAN2).

Charles Pierre, Terrier Benjamin, Perrodeau Élodie, Cohen Pascal, Faguer Stanislas, Huart Antoine, Hamidou Mohamed, Agard Christian, Bonnotte Bernard, Samson Maxime, Karras Alexandre, Jourde-Chiche Noémie, Lifermann François, Gobert Pierre, Hanrotel-Saliou Catherine, Godmer Pascal, Martin-Silva Nicolas, Pugnet Grégory, Matignon Marie, Aumaitre Olivier, Viallard Jean-François, Maurier François, Meaux-Ruault Nadine, Rivière Sophie, Sibilia Jean, Puéchal Xavier, Ravaud Philippe, Mouthon Luc, Guillevin Loïc, French Vasculitis Study Group

Клиническое исследование III фазыСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To compare individually tailored, based on trimestrial biological parameter monitoring, to fixed-schedule rituximab reinfusion for remission maintenance of antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAVs).

METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed or relapsing granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) or microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) in complete remission after induction therapy were included in an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. All tailored-arm patients received a 500 mg rituximab infusion at randomisation, with rituximab reinfusion only when CD19+B lymphocytes or ANCA had reappeared or ANCA titre rose markedly based on trimestrial testing until month 18. Controls received a fixed 500 mg rituximab infusion on days 0 and 14 postrandomisation, then 6, 12 and 18 months after the first infusion. The primary endpoint was the number of relapses (new or reappearing symptom(s) or worsening disease with Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS)>0) at month 28 evaluated by an independent Adjudication Committee blinded to treatment group.

RESULTS

Among the 162 patients (mean age: 60 years; 42% women) included, 117 (72.2%) had GPA and 45 (27.8%) had MPA. Preinclusion induction therapy included cyclophosphamide for 100 (61.7%), rituximab for 61 (37.6%) and methotrexate for 1 (0.6%). At month 28, 21 patients had suffered 22 relapses: 14/81 (17.3%) in 13 tailored-infusion recipients and 8/81 (9.9%) in 8 fixed-schedule patients (p=0.22). The tailored-infusion versus fixed-schedule group, respectively, received 248 vs 381 infusions, with medians (IQR) of 3 (2-4) vs 5 (5-5) administrations.

CONCLUSION

AAV relapse rates did not differ significantly between individually tailored and fixed-schedule rituximab regimens. Individually tailored-arm patients received fewer rituximab infusions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01731561; Results.

Для цитирования: Charles Pierre, Terrier Benjamin, Perrodeau Élodie, Cohen Pascal, Faguer Stanislas, Huart Antoine, Hamidou Mohamed, Agard Christian, Bonnotte Bernard, Samson Maxime, Karras Alexandre, Jourde-Chiche Noémie, Lifermann François, Gobert Pierre, Hanrotel-Saliou Catherine, Godmer Pascal, Martin-Silva Nicolas, Pugnet Grégory, Matignon Marie, Aumaitre Olivier, Viallard Jean-François, Maurier François, Meaux-Ruault Nadine, Rivière Sophie, Sibilia Jean, Puéchal Xavier, Ravaud Philippe, Mouthon Luc, Guillevin Loïc, French Vasculitis Study Group. Comparison of individually tailored versus fixed-schedule rituximab regimen to maintain ANCA-associated vasculitis remission: results of a multicentre, randomised controlled, phase III trial (MAINRITSAN2).. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2018. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212878.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.