MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2152/jmi.57.133

Медицинская библиотека · The journal of medical investigation : JMI · 2010

Radiographic comparison between male and female patients with lumbar spondylolysis.

Takao Shoichiro, Sakai Toshinori, Sairyo Koichi, Kondo Tadashi, Ueno Junji, Yasui Natsuo, Nishitani Hiromu

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We studied the lumbar spines of 117 adults (39 women and 78 men) with spondylolysis unrelated to low back pain using multidetector computed tomography (CT). Of the 117 subjects with spondylolysis, including five with multiple-level spondylolysis, there were 124 vertebrae with spondylolysis. In adult lumbar spines with unilateral spondylolysis, there was no significant difference between the incidence of spondylolisthesis in female and male subjects. However, in those with bilateral spondylolysis, there was a significantly higher incidence of spondylolisthesis in female subjects (90.9%) than in males (66.2%). Furthermore, females with bilateral spondylolysis had significant more slippage than males. Lumbar index and lumbar lordosis were not significantly different between male and female subjects, and did not significantly correlate with slippage. In conclusion, to treat acute spondylolysis in adolescents, it is important to obtain bony union at least unilaterally, especially in female subjects, to prevent further slippage.

Для цитирования: Takao Shoichiro, Sakai Toshinori, Sairyo Koichi, Kondo Tadashi, Ueno Junji, Yasui Natsuo, Nishitani Hiromu. Radiographic comparison between male and female patients with lumbar spondylolysis.. The journal of medical investigation : JMI. 2010. DOI: 10.2152/jmi.57.133.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.