MedElevator
Войти в исследования Spine · 2023
Feasibility of C2 Pedicle Screw Fixation With the "in-out-in" Technique for Patients With Basilar Invagination.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xu Panjie, Lin Junyu, Xiao Hang, Zheng Jianying, Ji Wei
Аннотация
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of C2 pedicle screw fixation with the "in-out-in" technique in patients with basilar invagination (BI).
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The "in-out-in" technique is a fixation technique in which the screw enters the vertebrae through the parapedicle. The technique has been used in upper cervical spine fixation. However, anatomic parameters associated with the application of this technique in patients with BI are unclear.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We measured the C2 pedicle width (PW), the distance between the vertebral artery (VA) and the transverse foramen (VATF), the safe zone, and the limit zone. The lateral safe zone is the distance from the medial/lateral cortex of the C2 pedicle to the VA (LPVA/MPVA), and the medial safe zone is the distance from the medial/lateral cortex of the C2 pedicle to the dura (MPD/LPD). The lateral limit zone is the sum of LPVA/MPVA and VATF (LPTF/MPTF), and the medial limit zone is the distance from the medial/lateral cortex of the C2 pedicle to the spinal cord (MPSC/LPSC). PW, LPVA, MPVA, and VATF were measured on the reconstructed CT angiography. PW, MPD, LPD, MPSC, and LPSC were measured on MRI. We define a width greater than 4 mm as safe for screw. The t -test was used to compare the parameters between male and female, left and right sides in all patients, and PW in CTA and MRI data in the same patient. For intrarater reliabilities, interclass correlation coefficients were calculated.
RESULTS: A total of 154 patients (49 CTA, 143 MRI) were included. The average PW, LPVA, MPVA, LPTF, MPTF, MPD, LPD, MPSC, and LPSC were 5.30 mm, 1.28 mm, 6.60 mm, 2.45 mm, 8.94 mm, 2.09 mm, 7.07 mm, 5.51 mm, and 10.48 mm, respectively. Furthermore, in patients with PW <4 mm, 53.6% of MPVA, 86.2% of LPTF, and all limit zones were larger than 4 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with BI, there is sufficient space medially and laterally to the C2 pedicle for partial screw encroachment to achieve "in-out-in" fixation, even if the pedicle is small.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level-4.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of C2 pedicle screw fixation with the "in-out-in" technique in patients with basilar invagination (BI).
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The "in-out-in" technique is a fixation technique in which the screw enters the vertebrae through the parapedicle. The technique has been used in upper cervical spine fixation. However, anatomic parameters associated with the application of this technique in patients with BI are unclear.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We measured the C2 pedicle width (PW), the distance between the vertebral artery (VA) and the transverse foramen (VATF), the safe zone, and the limit zone. The lateral safe zone is the distance from the medial/lateral cortex of the C2 pedicle to the VA (LPVA/MPVA), and the medial safe zone is the distance from the medial/lateral cortex of the C2 pedicle to the dura (MPD/LPD). The lateral limit zone is the sum of LPVA/MPVA and VATF (LPTF/MPTF), and the medial limit zone is the distance from the medial/lateral cortex of the C2 pedicle to the spinal cord (MPSC/LPSC). PW, LPVA, MPVA, and VATF were measured on the reconstructed CT angiography. PW, MPD, LPD, MPSC, and LPSC were measured on MRI. We define a width greater than 4 mm as safe for screw. The t -test was used to compare the parameters between male and female, left and right sides in all patients, and PW in CTA and MRI data in the same patient. For intrarater reliabilities, interclass correlation coefficients were calculated.
RESULTS: A total of 154 patients (49 CTA, 143 MRI) were included. The average PW, LPVA, MPVA, LPTF, MPTF, MPD, LPD, MPSC, and LPSC were 5.30 mm, 1.28 mm, 6.60 mm, 2.45 mm, 8.94 mm, 2.09 mm, 7.07 mm, 5.51 mm, and 10.48 mm, respectively. Furthermore, in patients with PW <4 mm, 53.6% of MPVA, 86.2% of LPTF, and all limit zones were larger than 4 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with BI, there is sufficient space medially and laterally to the C2 pedicle for partial screw encroachment to achieve "in-out-in" fixation, even if the pedicle is small.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level-4.