MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/brs.0000000000004594

Медицинская библиотека · Spine · 2023

An Immunologic and Biomechanical Comparison of Polyether Ether Ketone-Zeolite and Polyether Ether Ketone Interbody Fusion Devices.

Cheng Boyle C, Swink Isaac, McClain Edward J, Vyas Praveer S, Muzzonigro Thomas, Carbone Jake, Zaidi Ali, Long Jason D, Altman Daniel T, Yu Alexander K

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

A laboratory study comparing polyether ether ketone (PEEK)-zeolite and PEEK spinal implants in an ovine model.

OBJECTIVE

This study challenges a conventional spinal implant material, PEEK, to PEEK-zeolite using a nonplated cervical ovine model.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although widely used for spinal implants due to its material properties, PEEK is hydrophobic, resulting in poor osseointegration, and elicits a mild nonspecific foreign body response. Zeolites are negatively charged aluminosilicate materials that are hypothesized to reduce this pro-inflammatory response when used as a compounding material with PEEK.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Fourteen skeletally mature sheep were, each, implanted with one PEEK-zeolite interbody device and one PEEK interbody device. Both devices were packed with autograft and allograft material and randomly assigned to one of 2 cervical disc levels. The study involved 2 survival time points (12 and 26 weeks) and biomechanical, radiographic, and immunologic endpoints. One sheep expired from complications not related to the device or procedure. A biomechanical evaluation was based on measures of segmental flexibility, using 6 degrees of freedom pneumatic spine tester. Radiographic evaluation was performed using microcomputed tomography scans in a blinded manner by 3 physicians. Levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha at the implant, were quantified using immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

PEEK-zeolite and PEEK exhibited an equivalent range of motion in flexion extension, lateral bending, and axial torsion. A motion was significantly reduced for implanted devices at both time points as compared with native segments. Radiographic assessments of fusion and bone formation were similar for both devices. PEEK-zeolite exhibited lower levels of IL-1β ( P = 0.0003) and IL-6 ( P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

PEEK-zeolite interbody fusion devices provide initial fixation substantially equivalent to PEEK implants but exhibit a reduced pro-inflammatory response. PEEK-zeolite devices may reduce the chronic inflammation and fibrosis previously observed with PEEK devices.

Для цитирования: Cheng Boyle C, Swink Isaac, McClain Edward J, Vyas Praveer S, Muzzonigro Thomas, Carbone Jake, Zaidi Ali, Long Jason D, Altman Daniel T, Yu Alexander K. An Immunologic and Biomechanical Comparison of Polyether Ether Ketone-Zeolite and Polyether Ether Ketone Interbody Fusion Devices.. Spine. 2023. DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004594.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.