Comparing the Surgical Response of Bisphosphonate-Related Versus Denosumab-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws.

PURPOSE: The pathophysiology and treatment of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) remain unclear after nearly two decades of recorded observation and discussion. The purpose of this study was to assess outcomes of surgical resection of MRONJ in patients exposed to denosumab.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A literature review was performed in conjunction with experts at the University of Illinois at Chicago Library. The primary outcome of interest was surgical success defined by maintenance of complete mucosal closure without bone exposure and infection after surgical resection. Secondary interests included demographics, MRONJ stage, location of the focus of osteonecrosis, and the primary underlying disease necessitating antiresorptive treatment. Statistical analysis was performed by χ2, analysis of variance, or t test (P < .05 and b = 0.2 or a power of 0.8).

RESULTS

A total of 70 articles were identified and 14 met inclusion criteria. Twenty patients were included (13 women; 7 men); age 61.8 years ± 12.9 (range 19 to 77); and MRONJ stage I (40.0%), II (35.0%), and III (25.0%). Most cases occurred in the mandible (65.0%), followed by the maxilla (30.0%). The success rate of surgical intervention for MRONJ secondary to denosumab was in 16 of 20 (80.0%) patients. Stage I MRONJ lesions achieved mucosal closure in 100% of patients, stage II in 71.4%, and stage III in 60.0%. The surgical success rate was 83.3% in the maxilla and 76.9% in the mandible.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical success rate for MRONJ secondary to denosumab was 80.0%, similar to that reported in bisphosphonates of 85 to 95%; however, more evidence must be reported and analyzed.