Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2012
Is spinal manipulation effective for pain? An overview of systematic reviews.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Posadzki Paul
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This article is aimed at critically evaluating the evidence from systematic reviews (SRs) of spinal manipulation in patients with pain.
DESIGN: The study was designed as a SR of SRs.
METHODS: Four electronic databases were searched to identify all relevant articles of the effectiveness of spinal manipulation for pain. SRs were defined as articles employing a repeatable methods section.
RESULTS: Twenty-two SRs relating to the following pain conditions: low back pain (N = 6), headache (N = 5), neck pain (N = 4), any medical problem (N = 1), carpal tunnel syndrome (N = 1), dysmenorrhea (N = 1), fibromyalgia (N = 1), lateral epicondylitis (N = 1), musculoskeletal conditions (N = 1) and nonspinal pain (N = 1), were included. Positive or, for multiple SR, unanimously positive conclusions were drawn for none of the conditions mentioned earlier.
LIMITATION: Publication bias as a well-known phenomenon may have been inherited in this article.
CONCLUSION: Collectively, these data fail to demonstrate that spinal manipulation is an effective intervention for pain management.
DESIGN: The study was designed as a SR of SRs.
METHODS: Four electronic databases were searched to identify all relevant articles of the effectiveness of spinal manipulation for pain. SRs were defined as articles employing a repeatable methods section.
RESULTS: Twenty-two SRs relating to the following pain conditions: low back pain (N = 6), headache (N = 5), neck pain (N = 4), any medical problem (N = 1), carpal tunnel syndrome (N = 1), dysmenorrhea (N = 1), fibromyalgia (N = 1), lateral epicondylitis (N = 1), musculoskeletal conditions (N = 1) and nonspinal pain (N = 1), were included. Positive or, for multiple SR, unanimously positive conclusions were drawn for none of the conditions mentioned earlier.
LIMITATION: Publication bias as a well-known phenomenon may have been inherited in this article.
CONCLUSION: Collectively, these data fail to demonstrate that spinal manipulation is an effective intervention for pain management.