MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.014

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of arthroplasty · 2016

Prospective Comparison of Blood Culture Bottles and Conventional Swabs for Microbial Identification of Suspected Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

Geller Jeffrey A, MacCallum Katherine P, Murtaugh Taylor S, Patrick David A, Liabaud Barthelemy, Jonna Venkata K

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Early, accurate detection of infection is vital to successful treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Currently, no "gold standard" diagnostic testing exists. The goal of this prospective study was to compare the efficacy of a blood culture bottle system (BCBS) to commonly used culture swabs in confirming PJI in patients with high clinical suspicion.

METHODS

Patients were selected for enrollment based on Musculoskeletal Infection Society guidelines for PJI. erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein were obtained before aspiration. Aspirated fluid was divided between BCBS, swab, and synovial fluid analysis. Forty-nine samples were analyzed.

RESULTS

BCBS yielded 41 positive cultures vs 19 with swab (P < .0001), particularly with respect to Staphylococcus epidermidis. There were no false positive results in the BCBS group, using strict Musculoskeletal Infection Society guidelines.

CONCLUSION

BCBS increased identification of pathogens in lower extremity PJI, providing clinicians with a low-cost, broadly-applicable test.

Для цитирования: Geller Jeffrey A, MacCallum Katherine P, Murtaugh Taylor S, Patrick David A, Liabaud Barthelemy, Jonna Venkata K. Prospective Comparison of Blood Culture Bottles and Conventional Swabs for Microbial Identification of Suspected Periprosthetic Joint Infection.. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.014.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.