Cost-Utility Analysis of Ligament Reconstruction Tendon Interposition Versus Suture Suspension Arthroplasty for Thumb Osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND

Thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis (CMCJ OA) is a common degenerative condition that causes pain, stiffness, and disability, reducing quality of life. Surgery is a well-established treatment option when conservative management fails, but the optimal surgical approach remains debated. This study compared the cost-utility of trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI + T) versus suture suspension arthroplasty (SSA) for CMCJ OA.

METHODS

A Markov microsimulation model was developed to compare LRTI + T and SSA from a hospital payer perspective. Outcomes included incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total cost, and net monetary benefit. Clinical outcomes such as complication rates and revision surgery were also evaluated.

RESULTS

LRTI + T had a higher complication rate (14.6%) than SSA (9.8%), but SSA had a slightly higher revision rate (7.1% versus 5.7%). Over a lifetime, SSA provided an incremental gain of 0.25 QALYs but was marginally more expensive ($2855 versus $2842). SSA yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $53.80 per QALY, making it the more cost-effective strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

SSA is a cost-effective alternative to LRTI + T, offering valuable insights for clinicians and policymakers optimizing care for CMCJ OA patients.