MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · The Southeast Asian journal of tropical medicine and public health · 2004

A prospective evaluation of four immunodiagnotic assays for human leptospirosis.

Kemapunmanus Marisa, Sretrirutchai Somporn, Khuntikij Paiwon, Pradutkanchana Sukone, Pradutkanchana Jintana

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This was a prospective evaluation of four immunodiagnostic assays for human leptospirosis, including the indirect immunofluorescence test (IFA), the microscopic agglutination test (MAT), the LEPTO dipstick, and the latex agglutination (LA) test. Four hundred ninety-two serum samples were collected from 348 patients who presented with acute fever without localizing signs. The sensitivities of the IFA, MAT, Dipstick, and LA were 91.9, 76.6, 77.4, and 83.1%, respectively. The specificities of these assays were 100.0, 100.0, 89.3, and 83.5, respectively. Even though IFA showed the highest overall sensitivity and specificity, when acute sera were considered, the LA was the most sensitive (28.7%). All 3 genus specific antibody assays had broad reactivity against various serogroups. The MAT is best suited for the reference laboratory, where it can be maintained with the battery of live antigens; the IFA is suited for a laboratory with sophisticated equipment and technical expertise; the Dipstick and LA are suitable for peripheral laboratories which lack expensive equipment and expertise.

Для цитирования: Kemapunmanus Marisa, Sretrirutchai Somporn, Khuntikij Paiwon, Pradutkanchana Sukone, Pradutkanchana Jintana. A prospective evaluation of four immunodiagnotic assays for human leptospirosis.. The Southeast Asian journal of tropical medicine and public health. 2004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.