"Anti-Bios": Can Local Antibiotics Affect Bone Union in Infected Bone Defects Treated with Degradable Bone Substitutes.

Background

Segmental bone defects (SBDs) pose significant clinical challenges, often requiring complex reconstructive procedures. Degradable bone substitutes loaded with antibiotics have emerged as promising tools for infection control. However, their impact on bone healing remains uncertain. This study investigates antibiotic-loaded biodegradable scaffolds in infected defects using an in vivo rabbit model.

Methods

Thirty New Zealand white rabbits were divided into three groups-antibiotic-loaded GreenBone scaffolds, non-loaded GreenBone scaffolds, and allografts. A critical-size femoral defect was surgically created and inoculated with Staphylococcus epidermidis. Radiographic evaluations were performed over 16 weeks, followed by histological and microbiological analyses. Bone union, infection rates, and callus maturation were assessed.

Results

Eight rabbits were excluded for technical errors. Bone union was significantly lower in the antibiotic-loaded group (two rabbits out of seven; 28.6%) compared to the non-loaded scaffold (13 rabbits out of 15; 86.7%; p = 0.006). The antibiotic-loaded group exhibited a higher incidence of chronic osteomyelitis (100%) versus non-loaded implants (60%; p < 0.05). Histological evaluation revealed delayed bone maturation in the antibiotic-loaded group (22.2% HOES grade 3) compared to non-loaded scaffolds (69.5%; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Despite their infection-fighting potential, antibiotic-loaded biodegradable scaffolds may impair bone healing, leading to higher non-union rates and delayed maturation. These findings highlight a critical trade-off between local antibiotic therapy and bone regeneration, warranting careful clinical consideration and further research to optimize treatment strategies for infected bone defects.