MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00586-023-07608-5

Медицинская библиотека · European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023

An investigation of range of motion preservation in fusionless anterior double screw and cord constructs for scoliosis correction.

Trobisch Per, Mahoney Jonathan M, Eichenlaub Emily K, Antonacci Christopher L, Cuddihy Laury, Amin Dhara B, Razo-Castaneda Dominic, Orbach Mattan R, McGuckin Joshua P, Bucklen Brandon S, Antonacci M Darryl, Betz Randal R

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To evaluate the motion-preserving properties of vertebral body tethering with varying cord/screw constructs and cord thicknesses in cadaveric thoracolumbar spines.

METHODS

In vitro flexibility tests were performed on six fresh-frozen human cadaveric spines (T1-L5) (2 M, 4F) with a median age of 63 (59-to-80). An ± 8 Nm load was applied to determine range of motion (ROM) in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR) in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Specimens were tested with screws (T5-L4) and without cords. Single (4.0 mm and 5.0 mm) and double (4.0 mm) cord constructs were sequentially tensioned to 100 N and tested: (1) Single 4.0 mm and (2) 5.0 mm cords (T5-T12); (3) Double 4.0 mm cords (T5-12); (4) Single 4.0 mm and (5) 5.0 mm cord (T12-L4); (6) Double 4.0 mm cords (T12-L4).

RESULTS

In the thoracic spine (T5-T12), 4.0-5.0 mm single-cord constructs showed slight reductions in FE and 27-33% reductions in LB compared to intact, while double-cord constructs showed reductions of 24% and 40%, respectively. In the lumbar spine (T12-L4), double-cord constructs had greater reductions in FE (24%), LB (74%), and AR (25%) compared to intact, while single-cord constructs exhibited reductions of 2-4%, 68-69%, and 19-20%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The present biomechanical study found similar motion for 4.0-5.0 mm single-cord constructs and the least motion for double-cord constructs in the thoracic and lumbar spine suggesting that larger diameter 5.0 mm cords may be a more promising motion-preserving option, due to their increased durability compared to smaller cords. Future clinical studies are necessary to determine the impact of these findings on patient outcomes.

Для цитирования: Trobisch Per, Mahoney Jonathan M, Eichenlaub Emily K, Antonacci Christopher L, Cuddihy Laury, Amin Dhara B, Razo-Castaneda Dominic, Orbach Mattan R, McGuckin Joshua P, Bucklen Brandon S, Antonacci M Darryl, Betz Randal R. An investigation of range of motion preservation in fusionless anterior double screw and cord constructs for scoliosis correction.. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society. 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07608-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.