MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jos.2024.02.002

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association · 2024

Radiographic and clinical comparisons between loose-fit and press-fit stems in monopolar radial head arthroplasty for comminuted radial head fractures.

Shimura Haruhiko, Wakabayashi Yoshiaki, Yamada Tetsuya, Shirakawa Ken, Sato Tetsuya, Fujita Koji, Niizeki Yumi, Suzuki Shiro, Kaburagi Hidetoshi, Suzuki Hidetsugu, Nimura Akimoto

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Few clinical studies have compared the operative outcomes between loose- and press-fit stems in radial head arthroplasty (RHA). We aimed to evaluate the radiographic and clinical results of the two radial head implant concepts.

METHODS

In this retrospective multicenter study, 32 patients (24 women and 8 men) with a mean age of 63.1 years who underwent RHA for comminuted radial head fractures were reviewed between 2005 and 2021. Seventeen patients underwent RHA with a loose-fit stem (L-group), whereas the remaining fifteen patients underwent RHA with a press-fit stem (P-group). The mean follow-up period was 40.1 ± 9.9 months, with the minimum follow-up duration of 12 months. The radiographic findings were evaluated for periprosthetic osteolysis; furthermore, clinical outcomes were analyzed to measure the range of motion of the elbow. The rate of reoperations and prosthesis removal were also reviewed.

RESULTS

The general characteristics of the patients were similar in the two groups. The rate of periprosthetic osteolysis was 17.6% in the L-group, whereas it was 53.3% in the P-group. The mean elbow flexions were 128° and 133° in the L- and P-groups, respectively. The mean elbow extensions were -12° and -9° in the L- and P-groups, respectively. The rate of reoperation was 23.5% in the L-group and 15.2% in the P-group. One patient in the L-group had the prosthesis removed because of surgical site infection, whereas one patient in the P-group had the prosthesis removed owing to painful loosening.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences in the clinical outcomes and reoperation rate were observed between the two radial head implant concepts in this study. However, osteolysis occurred more frequently in the P-group. Although patients with periprosthetic osteolysis are currently asymptomatic, they should be carefully followed up for the symptoms in the long term.

Для цитирования: Shimura Haruhiko, Wakabayashi Yoshiaki, Yamada Tetsuya, Shirakawa Ken, Sato Tetsuya, Fujita Koji, Niizeki Yumi, Suzuki Shiro, Kaburagi Hidetoshi, Suzuki Hidetsugu, Nimura Akimoto. Radiographic and clinical comparisons between loose-fit and press-fit stems in monopolar radial head arthroplasty for comminuted radial head fractures.. Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2024.02.002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.