MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/ases.70275

Медицинская библиотека · Asian journal of endoscopic surgery · 2026

Ipsilateral Recurrent Hemothorax Caused by Spontaneous Intercostal Artery Rupture Treated With Transcatheter Arterial Embolization and Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Case Report.

Fujita Tomohiro, Ohno Takashi

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Hemothorax caused by intercostal artery rupture is a potentially life-threatening disease. A 66-year-old woman presented to our emergency department with left back pain. She had undergone surgery for left hemothorax 14 years ago. Contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography revealed active bleeding from the left dorsal ninth intercostal artery near the descending aorta. Subsequently, she developed hypovolemic shock. Based on her medical history, the patient was suspected of having adhesions in the left thoracic cavity. Surgery was considered a time-consuming approach to control the bleeding. Our first treatment choice was transcatheter arterial embolization, which could control the bleeding. Subsequently, we performed video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for a left large-volume hemothorax. The patient had no severe postoperative complications. Upfront transcatheter arterial embolization followed by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for recurrent hemothorax may be an effective, minimally invasive treatment strategy, particularly when surgical hemostasis is expected to be time-consuming.

Для цитирования: Fujita Tomohiro, Ohno Takashi. Ipsilateral Recurrent Hemothorax Caused by Spontaneous Intercostal Artery Rupture Treated With Transcatheter Arterial Embolization and Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Case Report.. Asian journal of endoscopic surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1111/ases.70275.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.