MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1292/jvms.64.735

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2002

Serological survey of leptospirosis in sows with premature birth and stillbirth in Chiba and Gunma prefectures of Japan.

Kazami Ayako, Watanabe Hideki, Hayashi Tetsu, Kobayashi Kazuhiko, Ogawa Yasuki, Yamamoto Koshi, Adachi Yoshikazu

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

In 1996 and 1997, the seroprevalence against Leptospira in parturient sows with premature birth or stillbirth from two herds was investigated. In three out of four sow serum samples obtained in Gunma Prefecture, the antibody titers to Leptospira interrogans serovar copenhageni (M20) were higher than 10,000 (the reciprocal of the serum dilution). Furthermore, the antibody titers to L. interrogans serovar canicola (Hond Utrecht IV) were significantly high in the three sows and the titers ranged from 1,000 to 3,000. In sows obtained in Chiba Prefecture, significantly high antibody titers to serovar copenhageni (M20) were confirmed in eight out of 40 sows, and antibody titers greater than 10,000 in six of them. Significantly high antibody titers to L. interrogans serovar icterohaemorrhagiae (RGA) and L. canicola (Hond Utrecht IV) were confirmed in four and 18 out of the 40 sows, respectively, compared with the titers to the other serovars. These findings may indicate the prevalence of leptospirosis in pig herds in both Gunma and Chiba Prefectures.

Для цитирования: Kazami Ayako, Watanabe Hideki, Hayashi Tetsu, Kobayashi Kazuhiko, Ogawa Yasuki, Yamamoto Koshi, Adachi Yoshikazu. Serological survey of leptospirosis in sows with premature birth and stillbirth in Chiba and Gunma prefectures of Japan.. The Journal of veterinary medical science. 2002. DOI: 10.1292/jvms.64.735.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.