Comparison of the clinical outcomes of intramedullary nailing between impending and completed pathological fractures caused by metastatic femoral tumors from solid cancers.

BACKGROUND

We examined the treatment outcomes following intramedullary nailing in patients with metastatic femoral tumors, excluding those from hematological malignancies.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated treatment outcomes following intramedullary nailing between patients who underwent preventative surgery compared with those who had surgery following pathological fracture. Patients who underwent preventative surgery (Mirels' score ≥8) were allocated to the impending fracture group (n = 11) and those who underwent surgery after pathological fracture were allocated to the completed fracture group (n = 20).

RESULTS

Duration of surgery was significantly shorter in the impending fracture group than in the completed fracture group. Median blood loss was significantly less, and the median duration of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the impending fracture group than in the completed fracture group. Among patients who died following surgery, the median postoperative survival duration was significantly longer in the impending fracture group than in the completed fracture group. Significantly more patients regained walking function in the impending fracture group than in the completed fracture group. Regarding complications, infection occurred in one patient in the completed fracture group. No implant damage was observed in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with metastatic femoral tumors who underwent intramedullary nailing in the impending fracture group had better postoperative survival and gait function, less blood loss, and shorter durations of surgery and hospital stay than those in the completed fracture group. These findings indicate the importance of early diagnosis and treatment and value of treatment prior to fracture occurrence.