MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/230949900901700302

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong) · 2009

Laminar fractures as a severity marker in burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine.

Tisot Rodrigo A, Avanzi Osmar

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To assess the correlation between the presence of lamina fractures, narrowing of the spinal canal, and the severity of injury.

METHODS

Records of 146 men and 44 women aged 13 to 84 (mean, 39) years diagnosed with burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine were retrospectively reviewed. The laminar fractures and narrowing of the spinal canal were measured using computed tomography. The severity of injury was determined using the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and the New Injury Severity Score (NISS). The ISS and NISS of patients with and without laminar fractures were compared. The sensitivity and specificity of ISS, NISS, and narrowing of the spinal canal in association with laminar fractures were also compared.

RESULTS

92 (48%) of the patients had laminar fractures. The mean narrowing of the spinal canal was more severe in patients with laminar fractures than those without (47% vs 28%, p<0.001). Patients with laminar fractures had a significantly higher mean ISS (17 vs 12, p<0.001) and NISS (19 vs 13, p<0.001). Narrowing of the spinal canal is more sensitive and specific than the ISS and NISS when correlating laminar fractures.

CONCLUSION

In patients with burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine, the presence of laminar fractures indicates a more severe injury.

Для цитирования: Tisot Rodrigo A, Avanzi Osmar. Laminar fractures as a severity marker in burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine.. Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong). 2009. DOI: 10.1177/230949900901700302.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.