m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025

Tracheostomy Tube Change Versus PEEP Titration on Tracheostomy-Dependent Infants With Airway Malacia and Ventilator Instability.

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Thompson Harrison M, Hubbard Mikayla, Krasinkiewicz Johnny, Bauer Sarah E, Chen Diane W

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titrations or tracheostomy size change (trach change) on ventilation stability in infants with tracheobronchomalacia.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review.

SETTING: Tertiary care children's hospital from 2015 to 2023.

METHODS: A retrospective chart review on ventilator and tracheostomy-dependent patients <1 year of age. Demographics, bronchoscopic findings, and ventilator outcomes within 14 days were recorded. Analysis was performed with chi-square, Fisher's exact, binomial regression analysis, and two-tailed t tests.

RESULTS: Of 71 patients (66% male, median 6.1 months old [interquartile range, IQR, 4.6-7.3]) who underwent 74 initial bronchoscopies, the PEEP titration cohort (n = 37) experienced an improvement (narrower) in 24-hour mean ventilatory ranges (peak inspiratory pressure [PIP] 5.6 pre vs 2.9 post, P = .01; fraction of inspired oxygen [FiO2] range 5% vs 3%, P = .04), whereas the trach change cohort did not (PEEP 5.9 vs 5.6, P = .8; FiO2 10% vs 5%, P = .07). In patients with airway malacia, the PEEP titration cohort had improved PIP ranges postintervention (5.5 vs 3.0, P = .02), whereas the trach change cohort did not (4.4 vs 6.6, P = .13). In patients without airway malacia, trach change correlated with improved PIP (8.4 vs 3.8, P = .04). Repeat bronchoscopy after initial intervention was significantly more common after trach change compared to PEEP titration (22% vs 3%, P = .01).

CONCLUSION: PEEP titration was associated with improved PIP and FiO2 ventilatory outcomes with a lower rate of repeat bronchoscopy compared to trach change, suggesting trach change alone may have little impact with greater subsequent interventional needs compared to PEEP titration.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты