Staged Approach to Tibial Nail Removal Poses Increased Risk for Infection in the Setting of Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND

While previous research has addressed conversion arthroplasty scenarios, there is limited data on outcomes of staged or concurrent removal of intramedullary (IM) nails during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Our study aimed to explore the association between the timing of IM nail removal and the incidence of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), surgical site infection (SSI), manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), and aseptic revision at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years after TKA when IM nail removal is performed in either a (1) staged or (2) concurrent manner.

METHODS

We queried a national, all-payer database of all patients who underwent a primary TKA and hardware removal of an IM tibial nail. The group was separated into mutually exclusive cohorts with removal performed either (1) in a staged manner (n = 287) or (2) on the same day of TKA (n = 2,958). Surgical complications included the following: PJIs, SSIs, MUAs, and aseptic revisions. Surgical complications were collected at 90-day, 1 year, and 2-year time points.

RESULTS

Patients who had staged nail removal before TKA demonstrated the highest incidence of PJI at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years (13.9, 16.7, and 17.1%, respectively). Adjusted multivariate regression analyses demonstrated significantly higher odds of a PJI, SSI, and MUA at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years for all patients who had staged nail removal TKA (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

There was an observed association between concurrent IM nail removal and a decreased risk of PJI, SSI, and MUA when compared to patients who had nail removal in a staged fashion. However, this does not discount the utility of the staged approach, as it may be necessary for patients less tolerant to longer operative times.