MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2106/jbjs.24.01463

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume · 2025

Assessment of the Mechanical Performance of an Affordable External Fixator (AEFIX) Designed for Resource-Limited Settings.

Momenzadeh Kaveh, Garcia Mason J, Zhao Leon, Chainani Pooja, Simister Samuel K, Hua Catherine, Miller Thomas, Höntzsch Dankward, Nazarian Ara, Agarwal-Harding Kiran J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are disproportionately affected by trauma, resulting in >5 million deaths annually. An essential treatment for musculoskeletal trauma is external fixation. However, in LMICs, current external fixator assemblies are unaffordable, costing patients upward of $5,000 (USD), leaving LMICs to rely on donations that fail to meet the needs of the patient population.

METHODS

New, affordable external fixator (AEFIX) clamps (SONA Global), designed for use in LMIC settings, were compared with Hoffmann 3 (Stryker Medical) clamps to examine their mechanical efficacy compared with commercially available, industry-standard clamps in the U.S. market. In axial and torsional loading scenarios, mechanical testing was performed at the component level and construct level (uniplanar external fixation of a tibial diaphyseal fracture).

RESULTS

The AEFIX constructs showed no differences in axial or torsional stiffness compared with Stryker constructs. AEFIX constructs yielded at 434.5 N compared with Stryker constructs at 533.6 N (p = 0.04); however, the pins failed before clamp failure could occur in all AEFIX and Stryker constructs. Under cyclic loading at 100 and 300 N, no differences were observed in construct stiffness or interfragmentary gap change. At 500 N of cyclic loading, the AEFIX and Stryker constructs resulted in median gap changes of -4.3 and -1.1 mm, respectively (p < 0.001), with no difference in % change in construct stiffness (p = 0.281).

CONCLUSIONS

AEFIX clamps were comparable to industry-standard Stryker Hoffman 3 clamps in terms of mechanical properties and effectiveness, suggesting that the AEFIX clamps may provide safe external fracture fixation in the non-weight-bearing patient.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As a safe and affordable solution, AEFIX clamps provide a foundation for enhancing essential trauma surgery capacity in resource-constrained settings around the globe.

Для цитирования: Momenzadeh Kaveh, Garcia Mason J, Zhao Leon, Chainani Pooja, Simister Samuel K, Hua Catherine, Miller Thomas, Höntzsch Dankward, Nazarian Ara, Agarwal-Harding Kiran J. Assessment of the Mechanical Performance of an Affordable External Fixator (AEFIX) Designed for Resource-Limited Settings.. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume. 2025. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.24.01463.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.