MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12893-022-01838-y

Медицинская библиотека · BMC surgery · 2022

A quantitative accuracy assessment of the use of a rigid robotic arm in navigated placement of 726 pedicle screws.

Benech Carlo Alberto, Perez Rosa, Benech Franco, Shirk Torrey, Bucklen Brandon S

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Traditional minimally invasive fluoroscopy-based techniques for pedicle screw placement utilize guidance, which may require fluoroscopic shots. Computerized tomography (CT) navigation results in more accurate screw placement. Robotic surgery seeks to establish access and trajectory with greater accuracy.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the screw placement accuracy of a robotic platform.

METHODS

Demographic data, preoperative/postoperative CT scans, and complication rates of 127 patients who underwent lumbosacral pedicle screw placement with minimally invasive navigated robotic guidance using preoperative CT were analyzed.

RESULTS

On the GRS scale, 97.9% (711/726) of screws were graded A or B, 1.7% (12/726) of screws graded C, 0.4% (3/726) of screws graded D, and 0% graded E. Average offset from preoperative plan to final screw placement was 1.9 ± 1.5 mm from tip, 2.2 ± 1.4 mm from tail and 2.9 ± 2.3° of angulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic-assisted surgery utilizing preoperative CT workflow with intraoperative fluoroscopy-based registration improves pedicle screw placement accuracy within a patient's pedicles.

Для цитирования: Benech Carlo Alberto, Perez Rosa, Benech Franco, Shirk Torrey, Bucklen Brandon S. A quantitative accuracy assessment of the use of a rigid robotic arm in navigated placement of 726 pedicle screws.. BMC surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01838-y.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.