MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/sj.bdj.4813464

Медицинская библиотека · British dental journal · 2006

A survey of oral and maxillofacial pathology specimens submitted by general dental practitioners over a 30-year period.

Franklin C D, Jones A V

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To determine the range and frequency of diagnoses in specimens submitted for histopathological examination by general dental practitioners (GDPs).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was carried out of all cases submitted by GDPs for the period 1974-2003, using a Foxpro Windows database. The data were collated into 10 diagnostic categories each comprising number of diagnoses, percentage of each diagnosis within a diagnostic category and each diagnosis as a percentage of total cases.

RESULTS

GDPs submitted 6,666 cases out of a total of 53,474 for this period. While the total number of specimens increased four-fold over the 30-year period, specimens from GDPs increased from 7% to 17%. The range of diagnoses increased from 18 to 45. Of the 617 GDPs who submitted material, 279 (45%) submitted less than two specimens each in 30 years. Nine malignant neoplasms were diagnosed. Other significant pathology included 320 benign neoplasms as well as diagnoses ranging from mucosal lesions such as lichen planus to odontogenic cysts.

CONCLUSIONS

It is clear that GDPs have provided an increased number of biopsy specimens over the last three decades. This reflects an increasing demand by GDPs for a diagnostic oral histopathology service and their use of this service should be encouraged.

Для цитирования: Franklin C D, Jones A V. A survey of oral and maxillofacial pathology specimens submitted by general dental practitioners over a 30-year period.. British dental journal. 2006. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4813464.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.