MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/brs.0000000000004334

Медицинская библиотека · Spine · 2022

Ten-Year Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

Kwon Ji-Won, Park Yung, Lee Byung Ho, Yoon So Ra, Ha Joong-Won, Kim Hyunkyo, Suk Kyung-Soo, Moon Seong-Hwan, Kim Hak-Sun, Lee Hwan-Mo

СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

A retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the clinical and radiological results of minimally invasive (MI) versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in patients with single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis over a 10-year period.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few studies have compared 10-year follow-up outcomes between MI-TLIF and open TLIF.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected the outcome data of patients with single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis who underwent TLIF procedures using an MI (n = 108) or open (n = 53) approach. Fifty-two (48%) and 31 (58%) patients in the MI-TLIF and open TLIF groups, respectively, completed the 10-year follow-up. A primary clinical outcome included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) as well as visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain at baseline and at 2, 5, and 10 years postoperatively. The radiographic fusion rate and incidence of secondary surgery due to adjacent segment disease were assessed at 2, 5, and 10 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Intraoperative blood loss and length of hospitalization were significantly lower in the MI-TLIF group than in the open TLIF group. At 2 years postoperatively, the ODI and VAS scores for back and leg pain were significantly lower in the MI-TLIF group than in the open TLIF group. No significant differences were found in VAS scores for back and leg pain or ODI scores between the two groups at 10 years postoperatively. Radiographic fusion rates and prevalence of secondary surgery for adjacent segment disease were not significantly different between the groups at 10 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Efficacy of MI-TLIF for patients with single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis is comparable to that of open TLIF over 10-years. However, MI-TLIF may have superior perioperative recovery and 2-year postoperative functional outcomes than open TLIF.Level of Evidence: 3.

Для цитирования: Kwon Ji-Won, Park Yung, Lee Byung Ho, Yoon So Ra, Ha Joong-Won, Kim Hyunkyo, Suk Kyung-Soo, Moon Seong-Hwan, Kim Hak-Sun, Lee Hwan-Mo. Ten-Year Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.. Spine. 2022. DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004334.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.