MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Pain medicine case reports · 2025

Bilateral Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block in the Management of Headache Associated With Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Case Report.

Arteta Bilena Molina, Jaramillo Natalia Botero, Gutierrez Harold Acosta

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) plays a pivotal role in the modulation of craniofacial pain. SPG blocks have been explored for various headache types; however, their efficacy in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)-associated headaches remains underreported.

CASE REPORT: A 26-year-old woman with a history of chronic migraine and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia presented with severe holocranial headache and focal seizures following a central nervous system relapse and thrombocytopenia-induced bihemispheric SAH. Initial pharmacological management included hydromorphone, pregabalin, and amitriptyline. A bilateral transnasal SPG block was performed, followed by a fluoroscopy-guided SPG block, resulting in a significant reduction in pain intensity, from a numeric rating scale score of 10/10 to 3/10.

CONCLUSIONS

SPG blocks show promising potential in the management of persistent headaches following SAH. An initial noninvasive transnasal approach, followed by more invasive techniques when necessary, may provide substantial pain relief and improve patient quality of life. Further research is needed to validate these findings and optimize treatment protocols.

Для цитирования: Arteta Bilena Molina, Jaramillo Natalia Botero, Gutierrez Harold Acosta. Bilateral Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block in the Management of Headache Associated With Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Case Report.. Pain medicine case reports. 2025.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.