A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Clinical and Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Correlation in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation with Radiculopathy.

INTRODUCTION

Conventional magnetic resonance imaging findings frequently do not correlate with the symptoms of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Diffusion-weighted imaging can reveal important details about the microstructure of tissues. This study assessed the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DTI) in LDH with radiculopathy and explored the relationship between DTI values and clinical scores.

METHODS

Forty-five patients with LDH with radiculopathy were evaluated via DTI at the intraspinal (IS), intraforaminal (IF), and extraforaminal (EF) levels. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used for low back and leg pain. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring system, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) were used for functional evaluation.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significantly (p<0.05) difference between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) values on the affected side compared with those on contralateral normal side. The VAS score had a weak positive correlation with RMDQ score (r=0.279, P=0.050). The JOA score had a moderate negative correlation with RMDQ score (r=-0.428, P=0.002), whereas the ODI score had a moderate positive correlation with RMDQ score (r=0.554, P<0.001). There was a moderate positive correlation between ADC values at the IF level and the RMDQ score on the affected side (r=0.310, P=0.029). There was no correlation between FA values and JOA score. ODI had a significantly positive correlation with the contralateral normal side FA values at the IF (r=0.399, P=0.015), EF (r=0.368, P=0.008) and IS (r=0.343, P=0.015) levels. RMDQ had a weak positive correlation with the contralateral normal side FA values at the IF (r=0.311, P=0.028), IS (r=0.297, P=0.036) and EF (r=0.297, P=0.036) levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The decrease in FA values and the increase in ADC values are useful markers of compression. ADC correlates well with the patient's neurological symptoms and functional status. Conversely, FA correlates well with the patient's neurological symptoms, but is not correlated well with the functional status.