MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/17531934211031862

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of hand surgery, European volume · 2021

Medial femoral trochlea flap reconstruction versus proximal row carpectomy for Kienböck's disease: a morphometric comparison.

Van Handel Amelia C, Lynch Leigha M, Daruwalla Jimmy H, Higgins James P, Allen Kari L, Pet Mitchell A

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Surgical options for advanced Kienböck's disease include proximal row carpectomy or lunate reconstruction with a medial femoral trochlea osteochondral flap. This study compares morphology of the proximal capitate and the medial femoral trochlear surfaces to the proximal lunate using three-dimensional geometric morphometric analysis. Virtual articular surfaces were extracted from MRI studies of ten healthy volunteers. Distances between corresponding points on the proximal lunate and proximal capitate or medial femoral trochlear surfaces were measured. In seven subjects, mean inter-surface distance for the medial femoral trochlea-proximal lunate pair was significantly lower than the proximal capitate-proximal lunate pairing. In three subjects, mean proximal capitate-proximal lunate distance was significantly lower. We conclude that the medial femoral trochlear flap was anatomically closer to the shape of the proximal lunate in the majority of the examined subjects. However, we found that in three out of ten cases, the proximal capitate was a better match.

Для цитирования: Van Handel Amelia C, Lynch Leigha M, Daruwalla Jimmy H, Higgins James P, Allen Kari L, Pet Mitchell A. Medial femoral trochlea flap reconstruction versus proximal row carpectomy for Kienböck's disease: a morphometric comparison.. The Journal of hand surgery, European volume. 2021. DOI: 10.1177/17531934211031862.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.