Disability and rehabilitation · 2025
The effects of age and sex on active and passive hip range of motion in individuals with alkaptonuria.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Taylor Sophie, Dobbin Nick, Imrich Richard, Arnoux Jean-Baptiste, Ranganath Lakshminarayan R
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To report active and passive hip range of motion (ROM) data for individuals with alkaptonuria (AKU), with consideration for age, sex, and non-AKU comparative data.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a cross-sectional study design, 123 patients who had baseline ROM assessed in a previous international, multi-centre clinical trial were included. Data was compared between age groups, sexes, and with existing data from individuals without AKU. Data was analysed using a one-way ANOVA, paired t-test, and one-sample t-test, with results interpreted using partial eta squared and standardised mean differences (SMD).
RESULTS: Differences were observed across the age groups for active and passive flexion (F = 3.815, p = 0.006, ηp2 = 0.115) and active hip abduction (F = 1.941, p = 0.108, ηp2 = 0.062). Differences between sexes ranged from trivial-to-large (SMD = 0.03 to 1.90), with variability evident across the age groups. Individuals with AKU were within the lower range of scores observed for healthy adults in flexion (t = -8.545 to -3.166, p = 0.010 to <0.001) and abduction (t = -20.830 to -0.737, p = 0.478 to <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide insight into the clinical value of ROM with consideration for age, sex and normative data as a determinant of disease progression and functional ability within individuals with AKU.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a cross-sectional study design, 123 patients who had baseline ROM assessed in a previous international, multi-centre clinical trial were included. Data was compared between age groups, sexes, and with existing data from individuals without AKU. Data was analysed using a one-way ANOVA, paired t-test, and one-sample t-test, with results interpreted using partial eta squared and standardised mean differences (SMD).
RESULTS: Differences were observed across the age groups for active and passive flexion (F = 3.815, p = 0.006, ηp2 = 0.115) and active hip abduction (F = 1.941, p = 0.108, ηp2 = 0.062). Differences between sexes ranged from trivial-to-large (SMD = 0.03 to 1.90), with variability evident across the age groups. Individuals with AKU were within the lower range of scores observed for healthy adults in flexion (t = -8.545 to -3.166, p = 0.010 to <0.001) and abduction (t = -20.830 to -0.737, p = 0.478 to <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide insight into the clinical value of ROM with consideration for age, sex and normative data as a determinant of disease progression and functional ability within individuals with AKU.