The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2002
Techniques in cervical laminoplasty.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Patel Chetan K, Cunningham Benjamin J, Herkowitz Harry N
Аннотация
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Laminoplasty provides an alternative to anterior procedures or multilevel laminectomy for patients with multilevel spinal stenosis and myeloradiculopathy.
PURPOSE: To review the techniques, results and complications of cervical laminoplasty.
STUDY DESIGN: The three basic variations of laminoplasty are the single open door, the French door or midline and the Z-plasty technique. These techniques and their outcome are discussed in detail.
RESULTS: The recovery rate after laminoplasty ranges from 50% to 70% without statistical superiority of any one technique over another. Closure of opened laminae, temporary nerve root deficit, decreased neck range of motion and axial pain are the main complications of laminoplasty.
CONCLUSIONS: Good to excellent long-term clinical results can be expected for the appropriately selected patients regardless of the specific technique used.
PURPOSE: To review the techniques, results and complications of cervical laminoplasty.
STUDY DESIGN: The three basic variations of laminoplasty are the single open door, the French door or midline and the Z-plasty technique. These techniques and their outcome are discussed in detail.
RESULTS: The recovery rate after laminoplasty ranges from 50% to 70% without statistical superiority of any one technique over another. Closure of opened laminae, temporary nerve root deficit, decreased neck range of motion and axial pain are the main complications of laminoplasty.
CONCLUSIONS: Good to excellent long-term clinical results can be expected for the appropriately selected patients regardless of the specific technique used.