MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/prd.70051

Медицинская библиотека · Periodontology 2000 · 2026

Peri-implantitis-Is it mainly a clinician-initiated complication of implant therapy?

Chen Stephen T, Monje Alberto, Strauss Franz J, Schwarz Frank, Roccuzzo Andrea, Sailer Irena, Tarnow Dennis, Lambert France, Jovanovic Sascha, Buser Daniel

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: The high prevalence of peri-implantitis is concerning, with a growing consensus that the majority of cases are complications initiated by clinician-related errors rather than classic pathology. A primary predisposing factor for peri-implantitis is exposure of the micro-rough implant surfaces to the peri-implant sulcus after treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To identify surgical/prosthetic factors causing micro-rough surface exposure and advocate for prevention and evidence-based protocols.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

This paper reviews evidence linking surgical and prosthetic errors to micro-rough surface exposure to the sulcus and subsequent peri-implantitis development.

RESULTS

Surgical factors for surface exposure include malposition, avascular necrosis, and incomplete bone regeneration of peri-implant defects. Prosthetic factors include cement remnants and wide prosthetic emergence angles. Clinician-influenceable co-factors-including patient compliance, history of periodontitis, uncontrolled systemic factors/habits, lack of keratinized mucosa, prosthetic misfit, overcontoured/uncleansable prostheses, failure to detect early bone loss or mucosal changes, and inadequate maintenance-contribute to the initiation and progression of peri-implantitis once micro-rough surfaces are exposed.

CONCLUSIONS

Most peri-implantitis cases are preventable complications. Professional education and research must prioritize identifying clinician-related errors and adherence to foundational treatment principles. This requires a paradigm shift toward a complication-based model of peri-implantitis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To reduce the risk of peri-implantitis, clinicians should avoid clinical errors that lead to exposure of the micro-rough implant surface. Hybrid surface designs and subcrestal micro-rough surface placement should be considered as safety buffers. Success depends on meticulous diagnostics and planning, proper surgical/prosthetic execution, cleansable prosthesis design, and proactive maintenance to detect early bone loss and soft tissue changes.

Для цитирования: Chen Stephen T, Monje Alberto, Strauss Franz J, Schwarz Frank, Roccuzzo Andrea, Sailer Irena, Tarnow Dennis, Lambert France, Jovanovic Sascha, Buser Daniel. Peri-implantitis-Is it mainly a clinician-initiated complication of implant therapy?. Periodontology 2000. 2026. DOI: 10.1111/prd.70051.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.