MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00000637-199612000-00001

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of plastic surgery · 1996

The use of the labiocolumellar crease incision in rhinoplasty.

Spiro S A, Wolfe S A, Wider T M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Aurel Rethi, in 1934, first described the transverse upper columellar incision for open rhinoplasty for resection of a portion of columella in cases of overly projecting nasal tip. The mid columellar incision has come to be known as the "Rethi" incision. Numerous variations of this approach have been popularized through the years. Recently, a great debate has raged over the criteria to be used in selecting patients for rhinoplasty. In this paper, we review 100 consecutive rhinoplasties and discuss our technique of labiocolumellar crease incision for open approach, and relate the criteria that we utilize to select patients for open rhinoplasty. There were 37 male and 63 female patients. Of these, 32 primary, 45 secondary, 18 cleft, and 5 reconstructive rhinoplasties were performed. Twenty-eight percent of primary, 62% of secondary, 78% of cleft, and 80% of reconstructive rhinoplasties were performed using the open approach via the labiocolumellar crease incision. There were no cases of circulatory compromise of the columella. The presence of a scar along the columella base (as with the C-flap in cleft patients) should be an indication for open rhinoplasty. Several myths about the labiocolumellar crease incision are dispelled. Adhering to principles of aesthetic subunits should guide the surgeon to place scars in a less noticeable position.

Для цитирования: Spiro S A, Wolfe S A, Wider T M. The use of the labiocolumellar crease incision in rhinoplasty.. Annals of plastic surgery. 1996. DOI: 10.1097/00000637-199612000-00001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.