MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/nrrheum.2017.142

Медицинская библиотека · Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2017

Giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: current challenges and opportunities.

Dejaco Christian, Brouwer Elisabeth, Mason Justin C, Buttgereit Frank, Matteson Eric L, Dasgupta Bhaskar

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The fields of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) have advanced rapidly, resulting in a new understanding of these diseases. Fast-track strategies and improved awareness programmes that prevent irreversible sight loss through early diagnosis and treatment are a notable advance. Ultrasonography and other imaging techniques have been introduced into routine clinical practice and there have been promising reports on the efficacy of biologic agents, particularly IL-6 antagonists such as tocilizumab, in treating these conditions. Along with these developments, which should improve outcomes in patients with GCA and PMR, new questions and unmet needs have emerged; future research should address which pathogenetic mechanisms contribute to the different phases and clinical phenotypes of GCA, what role imaging has in the early diagnosis and monitoring of GCA and PMR, and in which patients and phases of these diseases novel biologic drugs should be used. This article discusses the implications of recent developments in our understanding of GCA and PMR, as well as the unmet needs concerning epidemiology, pathogenesis, imaging and treatment of these diseases.

Для цитирования: Dejaco Christian, Brouwer Elisabeth, Mason Justin C, Buttgereit Frank, Matteson Eric L, Dasgupta Bhaskar. Giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: current challenges and opportunities.. Nature reviews. Rheumatology. 2017. DOI: 10.1038/nrrheum.2017.142.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.