MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/dme.13679

Медицинская библиотека · Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2018

Prevalence of active Charcot disease in the East Midlands of England.

Metcalf L, Musgrove M, Bentley J, Berrington R, Bunting D, Mousley M, Thompson J, Sprengel M, Turtle-Savage V, Game F, Jeffcoate W

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIMS: To undertake a prospective point prevalence study of the prevalence of active Charcot neuro-inflammatory osteoarthropathy (Charcot disease) in a circumscribed part of England and to audit the time elapsing between disease onset and first diagnosis.

METHODS

The prevalence of active Charcot disease of the foot during a single month was assessed by specialist foot care teams at seven secondary care services in the East Midlands region of England.

RESULTS

A total of 90 cases were identified, representing 4.3 per 10 000 of the 205 033 total diabetes population of the region. The time elapsed from first presentation to any healthcare professional until diagnosis was also assessed. While the diagnosis was suspected or confirmed in one-third of patients within 2 weeks, it was not made for 2 months or more in 23 patients (24%).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-specialist professionals should have greater awareness of the existence of this uncommon complication of diabetes in the hope that earlier diagnosis will lead to lesser degrees of deformity.

Для цитирования: Metcalf L, Musgrove M, Bentley J, Berrington R, Bunting D, Mousley M, Thompson J, Sprengel M, Turtle-Savage V, Game F, Jeffcoate W. Prevalence of active Charcot disease in the East Midlands of England.. Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association. 2018. DOI: 10.1111/dme.13679.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.