MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.euo.2026.05.010

Медицинская библиотека · European urology oncology · 2026

Doublet Versus Triplet Therapy in High-volume Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer Patients with Bone Metastases: Results from the ARON-3 Study.

Mandel Philipp Cornelius, Wenzel Mike, Gandur Quiroga María Natalia, Bourlon Maria T, Chun Felix, Myint Zin W, Bernal Laura, Kopp Ray Manneh, Juan Fita Maria José, Büttner Thomas, Fiala Ondrej, Li Haoran, Bögemann Martin, Buchler Tomas, Matthews Diana, Rizzo Alessandro, Ciccimarra Francesco, Marques Monteiro Fernando Sabino, Soares Andrey, Massari Francesco, Steuber Thomas, Santoni Matteo

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE

Data for direct comparison of the outcomes for androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) + androgen signaling pathway-inhibitors (ARPI) versus ADT + ARPI + docetaxel are scant, especially in patients with high-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), according to CHAARTED classification and regarding to the number of bone metastases.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PATICIPANTS: Relying on the multicentric international ARON-3 database, patients with high-volume mHSPC with bone metastases undergoing doublet versus triplet therapy were selected and stratified according to the number of bone metastases (≤10 vs >10). Primary endpoints consisted of time to treatment failure (TTF), prostate-specific antigen-response, and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 841 patients treated with doublet (75%) or triplet (25%) therapy were included. At 12 wk, triplet therapy was associated with changes in opioid use and in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. Median OS was 63.0 mo for ADT + abiraterone acetate and was not reached for ADT + apalutamide, ADT + enzalutamide, and ADT + docetaxel + darolutamide. Differences in adjusted TTF estimates between treatment groups were observed in patients with >10 bone metastases (hazard ratio [HR] 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-0.87; p = 0.02), whereas adjusted OS estimates also differed numerically but were not statistically significant (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.21-1.07; p = 0.1). In patients with concomitant visceral metastases, TTF and OS estimates also differed numerically by treatment group; however, these differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

In exploratory subgroup analyses, TTF and OS estimates varied by bone metastatic burden, but formal interaction testing did not show evidence of heterogeneity. These findings require prospective validation.

Для цитирования: Mandel Philipp Cornelius, Wenzel Mike, Gandur Quiroga María Natalia, Bourlon Maria T, Chun Felix, Myint Zin W, Bernal Laura, Kopp Ray Manneh, Juan Fita Maria José, Büttner Thomas, Fiala Ondrej, Li Haoran, Bögemann Martin, Buchler Tomas, Matthews Diana, Rizzo Alessandro, Ciccimarra Francesco, Marques Monteiro Fernando Sabino, Soares Andrey, Massari Francesco, Steuber Thomas, Santoni Matteo. Doublet Versus Triplet Therapy in High-volume Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer Patients with Bone Metastases: Results from the ARON-3 Study.. European urology oncology. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2026.05.010.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.