Ultrasound assessment of synovitis in total knee replacements: concordance with MR imaging and joint aspiration.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if diagnostic ultrasound can reliably distinguish between synovial patterns of prosthetic joint infection and polymeric wear in total knee replacements.

METHODS AND

METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by our hospital IRB. Using the radiology report database, MR examinations performed within a week of diagnostic ultrasound and/or ultrasound-guided aspiration were identified. This yielded (1) 24 cases with MR and ultrasound comparisons; (2) 44 cases with MR, ultrasound, and aspiration comparisons; and (3) 92 cases with ultrasound and aspiration comparisons. The MR studies were reviewed by a musculoskeletal radiologist. The ultrasound studies were each reviewed by 2 other musculoskeletal radiologists. Each study was graded for synovial pattern indicating infection, polymeric wear, or normal/nonspecific. Agreement between the MR grader and the ultrasound graders as well as ultrasound inter-rater agreement were assessed using k statistics. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of ultrasound were calculated.

RESULTS

Agreement between ultrasound and MR imaging was fair to moderate: k of 0.27 (95% CI: 0.04, 0.50) and 0.44 (95% CI: 0.23, 0.65) for ultrasound raters 1 and 2, respectively. Inter-rater agreement between ultrasound graders 1 and 2 was moderate, with k of 0.56 (95% CI: 0.42, 0.70). Ultrasound sensitivities for infection were 0.13 and 0.09, while specificities were 0.94 and 0.98. Ultrasound sensitivities for polymeric wear were 0.38 and 0.62 with specificities of 0.90 and 0.76.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound does not perform well in distinguishing patterns of synovitis either compared to MRI or a reference standard of aspiration/clinical follow-up.