MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.10.027

Медицинская библиотека · Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association · 2021

Editorial Commentary: Augmented Bankart Could Be the Right Option for Subcritical Bone Loss.

Lädermann Alexandre

Редакционная статьяКомментарийПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The suitable treatment for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with subcritical glenoid bone loss remains controversial. Although the Latarjet procedure is one of the most successful surgery for shoulder instability, it has been associated with potential complications in my patients with limited bone loss and poor soft-tissue conditions, which motivated me to further investigate Bankart augmentation techniques. A myriad of them have been devised and proposed for this specific group of patients; however, there are no sufficient clinical data reported in the literature to support one of them particularly or clarify in which situation they should be used. Further comparative and prospective studies are therefore needed to build an evidence-based decision tree to help us treating our patients and better match their expectations. That said, current literature and my experience have resulted in a shift in my treatment paradigm undertaken 3 years ago to augmented Bankart in case of subcritical glenoid bone loss.

Для цитирования: Lädermann Alexandre. Editorial Commentary: Augmented Bankart Could Be the Right Option for Subcritical Bone Loss.. Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.10.027.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.