1. Osteoclast Differentiation
1.1. A General Overview of Osteoclast Differentiation
Osteoclasts (OCs) are bone-resorbing cells that belong to the monocyte/macrophage lineage and are produced through a differentiation process called osteoclastogenesis ( Figure 1 ). The first cell appearing during osteoclastogenesis is represented by the colony forming unit-monocyte (CFU-M), a progenitor that resides in bone marrow and originates from the pluripotent hematopoietic stem cell [ 1 , 2 ]. The CFU-M gives rise to more differentiated precursors called monoblasts, which in turn differentiate to monocytes. This initial phase of osteoclastogenesis is also called monocyte differentiation or monocytopoiesis. After their release in the blood stream, monocytes migrate to the bone tissue where they are transformed into mononuclear OCs (in other terms, bone tissue macrophages). These cells can then fuse together, forming multi-nucleated OCs [ 1 , 2 ]. The functional difference between mononuclear and multi-nucleated OCs is not exactly clear but it is conceivable that the latter are characterized by a more pronounced capacity to induce bone resorption as compared to the former.
1.2. Molecular Regulation of the Process
The molecular regulation of osteoclast differentiation is quite complex ( Table 1 ) and, starting from this premise, attention will be especially focused on aspects exhibiting evident physio-pathological and therapeutic implications that are strictly related to the aims of the review.
The correct fulfilment of osteoclastogenesis requires the presence of a couple of important signalling molecules. The first is represented by monocyte colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), exerting a proliferation effect on the early pre-monocyte phase of the process and a survival effect on the entire process [ 3 , 4 ]. The second is represented by the ligand of receptor activating NFκB (RANKL), responsible for the differentiation effect occurring in the late post-monocyte phase of the process that is necessary to transform monocytes into OCs [ 3 , 4 ].
1.3. Role Played by M-CSF
The biological effects of M-CSF are determined through a typical tyrosine kinase receptor pathway ( Figure 2 ).
In fact, M-CSF induces the dimerization, phosphorylation, and activation of its receptor (M-CSFR), encoded by the c-fms gene that, acting through the Grb2 and Sos adapter proteins and the Ras G protein, triggers the activation of a family of serine/threonine kinases that are called mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK). MAPK are then responsible for the phosphorylation and activation of the activator protein—1 (AP-1) transcription factor, resulting by the dimerization of the proteins encoded by the c-jun and c-fos genes and, once formed, the AP-1) complex moves to the nucleus where it activates the transcription of target genes promoting cell division. The proliferation effect of M-CSF is also at least partly mediated by a cytosolic non-receptor tyrosine kinase that is called c-src (not represented in Figure 2 ).
On the other hand, the phosphorylated tyrosine kinase receptor also activates phosphatidyl inositol 3 kinase (PI3K) which in turn leads to the activation of two serine/threonine kinases that are named AKT and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). These enzymes are then respectively responsible for the survival and the metabolic effects of M-CSF (not represented in Figure 2 ).
1.4. Role Played by RANKL
RANKL determines its effects acting through the so-called nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NFκB) pathway. In this pathway, RANKL binds to its cognate receptor, RANK, inducing the intra-cellular recruitment of a family of proteins called TNF receptor associated factors (TRAF), among which the most important member is represented by TRAF6. Acting through a cascade of serine/threonine kinases named IκB kinase kinase (IKKK) and IκB kinase (IKK), TRAF6 determines the phosphorylation and degradation of a protein named inhibitor of NFκB (IκB) which, under basal conditions, sequesters and inactivates the NFκB transcription factor. NFκB becomes consequently stabilized and migrates to the nucleus where it activates the transcription of its target genes [ 5 ]. The most important among them is represented by the gene coding for the nuclear factor of activated T-cells cytoplasmic 1 (NFATc1) transcription factor [ 6 , 7 , 8 ], which is the master regulator of osteoclast differentiation and is responsible for the up-regulated expression of virtually all osteoclast differentiation markers, including dendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein (DC-STAMP), H+ ATPase, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), cathepsin K (CSTK), and matrix metallo-protease 9 (MMP9) [ 9 ].
1.5. Role of Osteoclast Differentiation Markers
Once expressed, osteoclast differentiation markers are responsible for the acquisition of all the typical phenotypic and functional properties of OCs. More precisely, DC-STAMP mediates cell fusion, and therefore the formation of multi-nucleated OCs; H + ATPase and TRAP are responsible for the degradation of the mineral (inorganic) component of bone; and CSTK and MMP-9 are responsible for the degradation of the protein (organic) component of bone.
1.6. Transcription Factors Regulating NFATc1 Activity
NFATc1 activity is due to a large set of transcription factors that are recruited by NFATc1 itself and favour the activation of its target genes. Examples of such transcription factors are represented by c-fos (already mentioned for its participation to the AP-1 complex [ 10 ]), PU.1 (also involved in the regulation of early monocyte differentiation [ 11 ]), various members of the microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MitF) family (such as TFE3 [ 12 , 13 , 14 ]), and MafB, although with apparently contradictory observations [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ].
The B-cell lymphoma 6 (Bcl6) transcription factor, conversely, antagonizes NAFTc1 activity and suppresses osteoclastogenesis [ 20 ].
1.7. Role Played by PKC
The molecular effects of NFATc1 and the other cooperating transcription factors is strongly supported by the phosphorylation activity of a Ca 2+ -dependent serine/threonine kinase called protein kinase C (PKC) [ 21 , 22 ]. This kinase is activated following the intra-cellular increase of Ca 2+ concentrations that is normally promoted by the activation of phospholipase C (PLC). In the situation under consideration, both the involved signalling pathways can activate PLC. In fact, in the case of M-CSF, PLC activation is determined by a direct interaction with the phosphorylated tyrosine receptor, whereas in the case of RANKL, the same effect is reached through a recruitment operated by TRAF6. These molecular mechanisms explain why agonists of the PLC–PKC pathway are able to sensibly potentiate osteoclast differentiation, whereas its inhibitors do exactly the opposite.
1.8. Role Played by Vitamin D3
Although controversial, a remarkable number of observations, listed below, support the role played by the active form of vitamin D3 (VD3) in the activation of osteoclast differentiation [ 23 , 24 ]. In fact: (1) stimulation with VD3 induces the monocyte differentiation of a large variety of hematopoietic cell types, suggesting that, although indirectly, it favours osteoclast differentiation [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ]; (2) treatment of the U937 monocytic cell line with VD3 and a powerful agonist of PKC, named phorbol myristate acetate (PMA), induces osteoclast differentiation [ 30 ]; (3) exposure of osteoblasts to VD3 activates the production of RANKL, the main inducer of osteoclast differentiation [ 31 , 32 ]; (4) acting on several cell types including OCs, VD3 induces the secretion of osteopontin, promoting the adhesion of OCs to extra-cellular matrix inside bone tissue [ 33 , 34 ]; (5) treatment of RANKL activated monocytes with VD3 potentiates osteoclast differentiation, although this effect favours the formation of mono-nucleated elements in place of their multi-nucleated counterpart [ 35 , 36 ]; and (6) knock-out of the vitamin D3 receptor (VDR), mediating the effect of VD3, abrogates osteoclast differentiation [ 37 ]. The apparent contrast between the capacity to activate OCs described thus far and the overall effect of bone deposition promoted by VD3 on bone tissue might be explained by the consideration that VD3 probably acts by stimulating the so-called bone remodelling cycle, responsible for the replacement of old bone with new one (see below) [ 38 ].
1.9. Role of Cytokines, Macrophage Polarization, and Chemical Factors
In addition to M-CSF and RANKL, numerous other signalling molecules, all classified in the cytokine family, regulate osteoclastic differentiation by either favouring or inhibiting the process [ 39 ]. Osteoclastogenic cytokines are represented by inflammatory cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα), interleukin-1 (IL-1), IL-6, and IL-8, and other interleukins such as IL-7, IL-11, IL-15, IL-17, IL-23, and IL-34. Anti-osteoclastogenic cytokines are instead represented by interferons (IFN), such as IFNα, IFNβ, and IFNγ and again interleukins such as IL-3, IL-4, IL-10, IL-12, IL-27, and IL-33. With the exception of TNFα, on activating the NFκB signalling pathway all other cytokines exert their biological effects through the cytokine receptor signalling pathway which uses, as intra-cellular transducers, members of the janus kinase (JAK) tyrosine kinase and the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) transcription factor families.
Osteoclastogenesis is also influenced by a process known as macrophage polarization according to which macrophages can undergo an M1 (inflammatory) or M2 (reparative) functional activation. In this regard, it has been demonstrated that an increase of M1/M2 ratio favours osteoclastic differentiation [ 40 , 41 ].
Among chemical factors able to modulate osteoclastogenesis, the most important are represented by increased extra-cellular concentrations of H + (acidosis) and Mg 2+ , both able to remarkably potentiate osteoclastic differentiation [ 16 , 42 ] and Zn 2+ , inhibiting the same process [ 43 ].
1.10. The Cross-Talk between Osteoblasts and Osteoclasts
Osteoblasts (OBs) are bone-forming cells residing in the bone tissue where they counteract the opposite activity of OCs. The interaction between osteoblasts and OCs is regulated by a complex network of stimuli. Besides promoting osteoclastogenesis, VD3 is also a powerful inducer of osteoblast differentiation. Upon exposure to VD3 stimulation, OBs also produce RANKL, favouring osteoclast differentiation [ 31 ]. At the same time, OBs produce an anti-RANKL soluble decoy receptor that is called osteoprotegerin (OPG) and inhibit RANKL activity. On the other site, OCs secrete a signalling molecule called Wnt able to enhance osteoblast differentiation acting through the β-catenin signalling pathway [ 32 ].
Acting together, OCs and OBs, participate to a process that is called bone remodelling cycle and is aimed to replace old/damaged bone with new/healthy one. This activity is divided in five steps: activation, resorption, reversal, formation, and termination. The first step is characterized by the activation of OCs, then leading to the resorption of bone that is accomplished during the second step. The third and most important step (also called the reversal phase of bone remodelling cycle) is needed by OCs to activate OBs, giving rise to the formation of bone occurring in the fourth step. This is a key moment of the process and, in addition to already mentioned stimuli secreted by OCs and acting on OBs (such as IL-6 and Wnt), it is thought to be mediated by ephrins, transforming growth factor-β(TGF-β), and bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) [ 44 ].
1.11. Osteoclasts as Therapeutic Targets in Human Diseases
Several bone disorders such as osteoporosis and Paget’s disease (metabolic) or cancer bone metastasis and multiple myeloma (neoplastic) are believed to be favoured by a mechanism of osteoclast activation leading to a condition of increased bone turn-over. In these circumstances, inhibition of osteoclast differentiation can be to all effects considered as a powerful tool to cure the underlying disease. Drugs used to inhibit osteoclast activity are defined anti-resorptive agents (AR), due to their capacity to contrast bone resorption. Among AR drugs, the most important are represented by bisphosphonates (BPs) and denosumab (DMAb).
1.12. Bisphosphonates
This denomination is due to their chemical similarity with pyrophosphate with which the BPs share the presence of two phosphate groups inside the molecule. BPs can be divided in two classes: non nitrogen-containing and nitrogen-containing BPs [ 45 ].
Non nitrogen-containing BPs are represented by clodronate and etidronate. These compounds were discovered earlier but are less active and for this reason their use is substantially restricted to metabolic bone disorders. They exert an anti-resorbing effect that is obtained by competing with the recruitment of intra-cellular ATP in OCs, thus blocking the energetic reserve of these cells, inducing their apoptosis.
Nitrogen-containing BPs, such as zoledronate (ZA) and pamidronate, were developed later, exhibit a stronger activity, and are predominantly used in neoplastic bone diseases, but lower doses are also prescribed in benign conditions. The action mechanisms of these drugs have not been completely understood. However it has been demonstrated that they are up-taken by OCs where they inhibit the mevalonate metabolic pathway thus preventing Ras farnesylation, necessary to allow its anchorage to cell membrane and the consequent activation [ 46 ]. At the same time, they also inhibit c-src and PKC activity, therefore leading to a block of the M-CSF pathway ( Figure 2 ). The final effect is similar to that observed with the non-nitrogen members of the family and is represented by the apoptosis of OCs. The persistence of nitrogen-containing BPs in bone has not been clearly quantified but it is supposed to remain there for a very long time due to a constant reuptake by new OCs [ 47 ].
1.13. Denosumab
Denosumab (DMAb) is a monoclonal antibody directed against RANKL and exerts its activity forming a complex with RANKL and thus inhibiting the activation of its downstream pathway [ 48 ]. Based on this premise, it is possible to consider that the action mechanism of DMAb mimics the activity of osteoprotegerin (OPG), a soluble anti-RANKL decoy receptor which is physiologically produced by OBs and inhibits OCs. A major difference, in comparison with BPs is therefore represented by the fact that DMAb is specific for the RANKL pathway ( Figure 2 ). Furthermore, due to the different action mechanisms, DMAb is supposed to have a limited effect over time. The dose and the schedule of administration of DMAb varies depending on the bone condition, administered at a dose of 120 mg per month in cancer patients as compared with 60 mg twice a year in osteoporosis.
2. A Pathological Condition Related to Anti-Resorptive Agents: Osteonecrosis of the Jaw
As already explained in the previous section, OCs are particularly active in several skeletal disorders with high bone turn-over such as osteoporosis and Paget’s disease or bone metastatic cancer and multiple myeloma. For these conditions, AR, BPs, and DMAb represent a medical tool widely used in the supportive care for the prevention of bone fractures. The type of AR drug, the dose, the schedule and the potency are modulated on the type of bone disease.
Like any other treatment, even ARs are not exempt from adverse events, and since 2003 [ 49 ] BPs and DMAb [ 50 ] have been related to a condition called osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), although a clear cause–effect relationship has not been completely demonstrated.
Interestingly, ONJ related to the use of BPs shares similarities with the historical phossy jaw induced by white phosphorus in the matchmaking industry.
Both BPs and DMAb target OCs, therefore, while the inhibition of osteoclastogenesis seems to be the most important mechanism involved, it might not be the only one.
Cases of ONJ have been related not solely to the use of AR, but also to anti-angiogenetic drugs and more rarely to other drug categories (i.e., tyrosine kinase inhibitors and m-TOR inhibitors; Figure 2 ) [ 51 , 52 ] supporting the concept that the pathogenesis might be multi-factorial.
Two key factors have been identified in anti-resorptive agents related osteonecrosis of the jaw (ARONJ): the potency of the drug and the duration of the treatment.
The importance of the potency has been extensively reported, and it can partly explain why ONJ is more frequently observed in the oncological setting compared with osteoporosis. The type of BP most frequently used in oncological and haematological patients is ZA, a highly potent nitrogen-containing BPs administered monthly. It is administered with a higher dose and frequency in these patients as compared to osteoporotic individuals.
The long duration of the treatment has been also observed in retrospective and prospective studies, and after 2003 the escalating incidence of bisphosphonate osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) induced haematologists and oncologists to review the guidelines for the administration of BPs, limiting the therapy to an average of 2 years and reserving prolonged treatment to selected cases [ 53 , 54 ].
These two factors alone however do not explain the phenomenon, and other risk factors have been identified: invasive procedures, infections, impaired angiogenesis, and “patient” factors, as reported in the clinical section.
This review is focused on OCs and their involvement in the development of ONJ, so we will analyse the OC-dependent factors involved in the pathogenesis of ONJ, with a brief mention of other possible mechanisms.
2.1. Osteoclasts Dependent Factors
Gross et al. analysed jaw bone samples of patients affected by BRONJ, observing a peculiar histological pattern characterized by giant OCs (1.6 times larger than control) and hyper-nucleated (1.9 times more nuclei compared with control), a known characteristic induced by BPs that can be partly explained by the high expression level of DC-STAMP, a molecule involved in cell–cell fusion. However, the OCs were inactive from the resorptive point of view, as demonstrated by the low expression of TRAP+ OCs (a marker of OC bone resorption), the absence of the raffle border, and by the high number of OCs detached from the bone surface [ 55 ].
In a following study, Wehrhan et al. compared bone samples of patients affected by BRONJ with osteoradionecrosis, osteomyelitis, and normal samples [ 56 ] analysing NFATc1, an OC activator, and Bcl6, an OC suppressor. NFATc1 is part of the RANK–NFκB pathway, and is a key regulator of osteoclastogenesis and OC activity. Bcl6 is a suppressor of osteoclastogenesis and OC activity via NFATc1, DC-STAMP, and CSTK. The results, apparently paradoxical, showed that in BRONJ both NFATc1 and Bcl6 expression appeared to be increased. Wehrhan hypothesized that the increased expression of NFATc1 and therefore the activation of DC-STAMP could be a compensatory effect to the inhibition of the OCs secondary to the BPs.
The effect of AR agents on the development of ONJ might be explained as an interference on both OCs and OBs. It is well known that the bone homeostasis is regulated by both OCs, the key cells in bone turn-over, and OBs, in a process called coupling. A possible explanation of the role played by AR in the development of ONJ comes from a paper published in 2014 by Williams et al. [ 57 ] who developed a mouse model of ONJ in animals treated with ZA (BRONJ) and anti-RANKL MoAb (DRONJ). Both groups developed post-extraction ONJ-like lesions of the jaw that were related to the inhibition of bone remodelling, affecting the OC and OB coupling. Animals affected showed higher numbers of empty lacunae and necrotic bone, with serum concentration of TRAP-5b (the 5b serum isoenzyme of TRAP) markedly suppressed, in addition to suppressed alkaline phosphates (ALP) indicating the inhibition of both OCs and OBs. The inhibition of the bone remodelling was confirmed by the inhibition of new bone formation in the extracted socket in mice with ONJ-like. The pH of the bone environment might also contribute to the development of the ONJ, since it is recognized that acid milieu enhances catabolic activity-inhibiting OBs [ 58 ]. In an animal model Kim observed that rats treated with BPs and NH 4 Cl were more prone to developing ONJ after tooth extraction. The histomorphometric analysis showed that the bone architecture was more deteriorated compared with the alkalotic group, with a significant higher necrotic bone and clusters of empty lacunae, possibly related to the inhibition of the OBs activity in an acidic environment and increased catabolic activity [ 58 ].
However, the effect of the AR is not selective on the skeleton. Thus, how do we explain the typical localization at the jaw? Gong et al. [ 59 ] observed that ZA-treated rats showed an inhibition of bone remodelling in tooth extraction socket but enhanced bone repair in other skeletal sites. The effect of ZA was also tested in vitro in bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) collected from the tooth extraction socket and peripheral bone injury site: even in this case the cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation was significantly inhibited in the cells collected in the jaw compared with other skeletal sites, possibly explaining the typical localization of ONJ. It has been observed in fact the accumulation of BPs is higher in the jaw compared with other skeletal sites due to the higher amount of hydroxyapatite and the high bone turnover [ 60 , 61 ]. These observations suggest that the cells in the craniofacial region are more sensitive to the treatment with ZA compared with other sites. In conclusions, BPs might favour ONJ formation affecting bone remodelling, through the inhibition of both OCs and also OBs in the coupling process.
2.2. Osteoclast-Independent Factors
2.2.1. Invasive Procedures and Possibly Delayed Healing
Invasive dental procedures have been confirmed in several studies as another important risk factor [ 62 ]. Invasive procedures might increase the risk of infection of the tooth extraction socket. Several studies observed different types of bacteria, fungi, and viruses in the exposed bone of ONJ, but a recent study the microbiota of patients with or without ONJ did not find significant differences. More than the infection itself, it seems to be the altered immune response of the host that favours the development of the ONJ [ 63 ].
Among the immune cells a role in ONJ development seems to be played by altered neutrophils, γδT cells, and natural killer cells [ 63 ]. The immune cells and macrophages are involved in the wound healing process. In a mouse model it has been observed that ZA enhanced M1 macrophage polarization and reduction of M2 macrophages related to elevated toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) expression, possibly interfering with wound healing [ 64 ]. In vitro studies demonstrated also that BPs alter macrophage viability and morphology [ 65 ].
2.2.2. Angiogenesis
The anti-angiogenetic effect of BPs has been observed in several studies, mediated by an anti-proliferative effect of BPs on endothelial cells and impaired vascularization of the mandible in rats [ 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 ]. Allegra et al. demonstrated a reduced number of circulating endothelial cells progenitors increased apoptosis of endothelial cells in myeloma patients treated with BPs, leading to anti-angiogenesis and avascular necrosis [ 67 ]. The mechanism might be mediated by the inhibition of IL-17, a mediator of angiogenesis through vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and TNFα [ 70 ]. Damage of the epithelial mucosa induced by BPs or sunitinib (a drug inhibiting several tyrosine kinase receptors) may have also a role in the development of ONJ with other co-factors [ 71 ].
3. Clinical Definition, Epidemiology, and Risk Factors for Osteonecrosis of the JAW
ONJ was described in 2003 [ 49 ] as painful bone exposure of the mandible, maxilla, or both, non-responsive to surgical and medical treatment in cancer patients receiving treatment with pamidronate or ZA. In 2010, DMAb-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (DRONJ) was observed [ 50 ]. In 2014 the anti-VEGF agent bevacizumab was also reported to induce ONJ [ 72 ]. In 2016 the anti-sclerostin antibody romosozumab in a phase III study was demonstrated to induce ONJ [ 73 ].
ONJ may stay asymptomatic for long periods, ranging from weeks to several months or years [ 74 ]. Typical clinical manifestations are painful and often infected areas of necrotic bone in maxillo-facial areas that can lead to severe chronic pain and facial soft tissue infections. This can impair eating and speaking of patients, and the quality of life of these patients rapidly decreases.
The International Task Force on ONJ [ 74 ] defines ONJ as: (1) Exposed bone in the maxillofacial region which does not heal within 8 weeks after identification by a health care provider; (2) Exposure to an anti-resorptive agent (BPs or DMAb); (3) No history of radiation therapy to the craniofacial region.
Evidence of exposed necrotic bone (E-ONJ) ( Figure 3 ) is restrictive for ONJ definition according to the International Task Force, but the non-exposed variant (NE-ONJ) ( Figure 4 ) has described by different groups of investigators and recently supported by a multicentre retrospective study [ 75 ]. Clinical features consistent with NE-ONJ include otherwise unexplained soreness in the jaws, fistula, loose teeth, swelling, and in advanced cases, pathological fracture of the mandible. Fedele et al. [ 75 ] described that use of alendronate, diagnosis of osteoporosis, and dental infection were more commonly found in patients with the NE-ONJ.
Despite the extensive ongoing research, the mechanism that induces ONJ is still unclear. The prevalence of BRONJ in patients taking oral BPs for the treatment of osteoporosis ranges from 0% to 0.04%. No information about the prevalence of DRONJ in patients receiving subcutaneous DMAb therapy for osteoporosis has been noted [ 74 ]. In ONJ epidemiology it has been documented that most cases (more than 90%) concern oncological patients receiving high doses of AR drugs [ 76 ]. The prevalence of BRONJ following tooth extraction in cancer patients receiving intravenous ZA is estimated to range from 1.6% to 14.8%; tooth extraction is the main triggering factor for the development of BRONJ in cancer patients [ 62 ].
A current systematic review [ 77 ] reported that the triggering factors of ONJ include: (1) dental extraction (61.7%) (2) spontaneous occurrence (14.8%) (3) oral surgery (7.2%) (4) prosthodontic trauma (7.4%) (5) periodontitis (5.0%) (6) dental implant treatment (3.9%)
Glucocorticoid therapy, diabetes, erythropoietin therapy, tobacco use, and renal dialysis have also been reported as concomitant medical issues.
Nevertheless, an increasing amount of data suggests that dental infection, instead of dental extraction in itself, might be the main local risk factor for medication-related ONJ [ 78 , 79 ]. This position was recently sustained by The European Task Force on medication-related ONJ [ 80 ]. The hypothesis supported by these data is that the osteonecrosis might arose within the alveolar bone due to intrabony periodontal infection, lacking mucosal fenestration and bone exposure [ 81 ]. Necrotic alveolar bone exposure could then develop or be a consequence of local triggering factors such as surgery or local trauma [ 75 ]. Because of dental/periodontal infection, a large part of ONJ patients had already developed NE-ONJ before the actual extraction occurred, and these cases should not be classified as E-ONJ [ 80 ]. Several scholars conclude that NE-ONJ and E-ONJ are manifestations of the same pathological entity [ 75 , 81 , 82 , 83 ].
As we have described above, the role of the active form of vitamin D3 (VD3) in the activation of OCs (and OBs) differentiation is described by several scholars [ 23 , 24 ]. A case–control study has recognized osteomalacia as a potential risk factor for BRONJ in oncological patients [ 84 ], which arises in the presence of VD3 deficiency [ 85 ]. Therefore, VD3 deficiency has been hypothesized by several authors as a risk factor for BRONJ in humans [ 86 , 87 ]. However, in a recent matched case–control study, patients with or without ONJ had the same frequency of VD3 deficiency and the same values of 25-OH-VD, parathormone (PTH), and most bone turnover markers. These results do not sustain the hypothesis that VD3 deficiency is involved in the pathogenesis of ONJ [ 87 ].
Drug Holiday and Treatment
The half-life of BPs is longer than 10 years [ 47 ]. There is no evidence that the discontinuation of oral BPs is necessary before dental surgery [ 74 ]. Discontinuation of intravenous BPs and subcutaneous DMAb may be considered by oncologists [ 74 ]. However, no data are available for supporting the effectiveness of secession of intravenous BPs and subcutaneous DMAb on the prevention of ONJ. In a recent study, the discontinuation of DMAb was associated with reversal features of osteonecrosis in a mouse model [ 88 ]. Otto et al. suggested that any surgical intervention for ONJ needed to be suspended for at least several months after DMAb administration to avoid manifestation of ONJ [ 89 ]. Further study is needed to develop an appropriate strategy.
Oral rinses, pain control, limited debridement, irrigation, antibiotic therapy, and follow-up observations are the main recommendations by the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons [ 72 ]. However, a recent systematic review of therapeutic approaches found that ONJ rarely healed after these conservative treatments [ 90 ] On the contrary, clinical studies showed that surgeries to resect necrotic bone and/or surrounding healthy bone frequently healed ONJ [ 91 ]. Appropriateness of bone resection has to be determined preoperatively on the basis of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR), since the presence of osteomyelitis at one margin of resection was a predictor of ONJ recurrence [ 92 ]. Fluorescence-guided bone surgery has also been described [ 93 ]. Dental radiographs (i.e., panoramic radiography) are less informative with respect to other imaging methods in describing the extent of bony disease in ONJ [ 94 ]. According to published evidence, CT and MR appear to be superior over panoramic radiography in the investigation of ONJ [ 95 , 96 ], and we recommend these techniques in clinical treatment planning.
The osteotomies performed using piezo-surgical devices show more advanced stages of bone healing compared with rotary instruments [ 97 ]. After the bone resection, sharp bony edges were smoothened using burs, and tension-free wound closure was achieved using muco-periosteal flaps and the buccal fat pad if necessary; local flaps for closure with impaired vascularization have to be avoided [ 92 , 98 , 99 ]. When a pathologic fracture or ONJ involves the sinus, or when bony resection leads to a discontinuity defect of the mandible, microvascular composite tissue flaps have to be taken into consideration [ 74 , 100 , 101 , 102 ]. On the contrary, bone substitutes and grafting with bioactive bone substitutes have to be shunned [ 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 ].
As prevention strategy, most of available guidelines recommend oral examination and removal of unsalvageable teeth: all invasive oral procedures have to be completed with recovery before the start any anti-resorptive drug treatment. It has been demonstrated that the prevention reduces the risk of ONJ, although without eliminating it completely [ 74 ].
4. Conclusions and Hypothesis on Pathogenesis of Osteonecrosis of the JAW
The correlation between AR agents and ONJ has not yet been completely elucidated.
An attempt to explain the pathogenesis of ONJ, connecting the many actors possibly involved in the process, has been proposed by Di Nisio et al. [ 111 ] who studied the RANK/RANKL/OPG pathway in BP-treated patients. They hypothesized that the lipopolysaccharide produced by bacteria infecting the jawbone could possibly trigger the RANK/RANKL/OPG pathway, leading to OC activation in order to delimitate the infection. We could consider that the inhibition of OCs and OBs induced by the treatments, the altered host immune response, and possibly the impairment of angiogenesis and epithelial mucosa may result in an inability to limit the process, favouring the development of ONJ.
Based on these considerations, healing from ONJ probably requires a number of events, for example local re-activation of OCs (necessary to degrade necrotic/inflamed bone), recruitment of OBs (important to produce new healthy bone in place of the old and damaged bone), fibroblast proliferation and formation of new blood vessels (in order to support the entire process), and epithelial proliferation (to assure the rescue of mucosal integrity). Although all these steps are fundamental in the bone repair activity in ONJ, we suppose that the local re-activation of OCs could be the most important because it is the first part of the healing process and it could consequently allow the correct fulfilment of the others. It is plausible that a thorough comprehension of the biological aspects regulating bone remodelling cycle, with special regard to its reversal phase, might help to develop novel medical strategies to successfully cure ONJ as an alternative to surgical procedures.
Author Contributions
Writing—original draft preparation, A.A., L.G., L.S., S.P., A.G.; writing—review and editing: A.A., L.G., L.S., S.P., A.G.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
References
1. Boyle W.J. Simonet W.S. Lacey D.L. Osteoclast differentiation and activation Nature 2003 423 337 342 10.1038/nature01658 12748652
2. Edwards J.R. Mundy G.R. Advances in osteoclast biology: Old findings and new insights from mouse models Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2011 7 235 243 10.1038/nrrheum.2011.23 21386794
3. Kim J.H. Kim N. Signaling Pathways in Osteoclast Differentiation Chonnam. Med. J. 2016 52 12 10.4068/cmj.2016.52.1.12 26865996 PMC4742606
4. Takayanagi H. Osteoimmunology: Shared mechanisms and crosstalk between the immune and bone systems Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2007 7 292 304 10.1038/nri2062 17380158
5. Boyce B.F. Xiu Y. Li J. Xing L. Yao Z. NF-κB-Mediated Regulation of Osteoclastogenesis Endocrinol. Metab. 2015 30 35 10.3803/EnM.2015.30.1.35 25827455 PMC4384681
6. Takayanagi H. Kim S. Koga T. Nishina H. Isshiki M. Yoshida H. Saiura A. Isobe M. Yokochi T. Inoue J. Induction and activation of the transcription factor NFATc1 (NFAT2) integrate RANKL signaling in terminal differentiation of osteoclasts Dev. Cell 2002 3 889 901 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00369-6 12479813
7. Gohda J. Akiyama T. Koga T. Takayanagi H. Tanaka S. Inoue J. RANK-mediated amplification of TRAF6 signaling leads to NFATc1 induction during osteoclastogenesis EMBO J. 2005 24 790 799 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600564 15678102 PMC549623
8. Asagiri M. Sato K. Usami T. Ochi S. Nishina H. Yoshida H. Morita I. Wagner E.F. Mak T.W. Serfling E. Autoamplification of NFATc1 expression determines its essential role in bone homeostasis J. Exp. Med. 2005 202 1261 1269 10.1084/jem.20051150 16275763 PMC2213228
9. Asagiri M. Takayanagi H. The molecular understanding of osteoclast differentiation Bone 2007 40 251 264 10.1016/j.bone.2006.09.023 17098490
10. Wagner E.F. Eferl R. Fos/AP-1 proteins in bone and the immune system Immunol. Rev. 2005 208 126 140 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00332.x 16313345
11. Ishiyama K. Yashiro T. Nakano N. Kasakura K. Miura R. Hara M. Kawai F. Maeda K. Tamura N. Okumura K. Involvement of PU.1 in NFATc1 promoter function in osteoclast development Allergol. Int. 2015 64 241 247 10.1016/j.alit.2015.01.006 26117255
12. Weilbaecher K.N. Motyckova G. Huber W.E. Takemoto C.M. Hemesath T.J. Xu Y. Hershey C.L. Dowland N.R. Wells A.G. Fisher D.E. Linkage of M-CSF signaling to Mitf, TFE3, and the osteoclast defect in Mitf(mi/mi) mice Mol. Cell 2001 8 749 758 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00360-4 11684011
13. Zanocco-Marani T. Vignudelli T. Gemelli C. Pirondi S. Testa A. Montanari M. Parenti S. Tenedini E. Grande A. Ferrari S. Tfe3 expression is closely associated to macrophage terminal differentiation of human hematopoietic myeloid precursors Exp. Cell Res. 2006 312 4079 4089 10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.09.015 17046750
14. Zanocco-Marani T. Vignudelli T. Parenti S. Gemelli C. Condorelli F. Martello A. Selmi T. Grande A. Ferrari S. TFE3 transcription factor regulates the expression of MAFB during macrophage differentiation Exp. Cell Res. 2009 315 1798 1808 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.03.018 19332055
15. Kim K. Kim J.H. Lee J. Jin H.M. Kook H. Kim K.K. Lee S.Y. Kim N. MafB negatively regulates RANKL-mediated osteoclast differentiation Blood 2007 109 3253 3259 10.1182/blood-2006-09-048249 17158225
16. Mammoli F. Castiglioni S. Parenti S. Cappadone C. Farruggia G. Iotti S. Davalli P. Maier J.A.M. Grande A. Frassineti C. Magnesium Is a Key Regulator of the Balance between Osteoclast and Osteoblast Differentiation in the Presence of Vitamin D 3 Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019 20 385 10.3390/ijms20020385 PMC6358963 30658432
17. Gemelli C. Montanari M. Tenedini E. Zanocco Marani T. Vignudelli T. Siena M. Zini R. Salati S. Tagliafico E. Manfredini R. Virally mediated MafB transduction induces the monocyte commitment of human CD34+ hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells Cell Death Differ. 2006 13 1686 1696 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401860 16456583
18. Gemelli C. Zanocco Marani T. Bicciato S. Mazza E.M.C. Boraschi D. Salsi V. Zappavigna V. Parenti S. Selmi T. Tagliafico E. MafB is a downstream target of the IL-10/STAT3 signaling pathway, involved in the regulation of macrophage de-activation Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014 1843 955 964 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.01.021 24472656
19. Italiani P. Mazza E.M.C. Lucchesi D. Cifola I. Gemelli C. Grande A. Battaglia C. Bicciato S. Boraschi D. Transcriptomic profiling of the development of the inflammatory response in human monocytes in vitro PLoS ONE 2014 9 e87680 10.1371/journal.pone.0087680 24498352 PMC3912012
20. Miyamoto T. Regulators of osteoclast differentiation and cell-cell fusion Keio J. Med. 2011 60 101 105 10.2302/kjm.60.101 22200633
21. Hwang S.-Y. Putney J.W. Calcium signaling in osteoclasts Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011 1813 979 983 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2010.11.002 21075150 PMC3078988
22. Lee S.W. Kwak H.B. Chung W.J. Cheong H. Kim H.-H. Lee Z.H. Participation of protein kinase C beta in osteoclast differentiation and function Bone 2003 32 217 227 10.1016/S8756-3282(02)00976-6 12667549
23. Li A. Cong Q. Xia X. Leong W.F. Yeh J. Miao D. Mishina Y. Liu H. Li B. Pharmacologic Calcitriol Inhibits Osteoclast Lineage Commitment via the BMP-Smad1 and IκB-NF-κB Pathways J. Bone Miner. Res. 2017 32 1406 1420 10.1002/jbmr.3146 28370465 PMC5814246
24. Takahashi N. Udagawa N. Udagawa N. Suda T. Vitamin D endocrine system and osteoclasts Bonekey Rep. 2014 3 495 10.1038/bonekey.2013.229 24605212 PMC3944126
25. Grande A. Manfredini R. Pizzanelli M. Tagliafico E. Balestri R. Trevisan F. Barbieri D. Franceschi C. Battini R. Ferrari S. Presence of a functional vitamin D receptor does not correlate with vitamin D3 phenotypic effects in myeloid differentiation Cell Death Differ. 1997 4 497 505 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400270 16465271
26. Grande A. Montanari M. Tagliafico E. Manfredini R. Zanocco Marani T. Siena M. Tenedini E. Gallinelli A. Ferrari S. Physiological levels of 1alpha, 25 dihydroxyvitamin D3 induce the monocytic commitment of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors J. Leukoc. Biol. 2002 71 641 651 11927651
27. Montanari M. Gemelli C. Tenedini E. Zanocco Marani T. Vignudelli T. Siena M. Zini R. Salati S. Chiossi G. Tagliafico E. Correlation between differentiation plasticity and mRNA expression profiling of CD34+-derived CD14- and CD14+ human normal myeloid precursors Cell Death Differ. 2005 12 1588 1600 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401679 15947790
28. Gemelli C. Orlandi C. Zanocco Marani T. Martello A. Vignudelli T. Ferrari F. Montanari M. Parenti S. Testa A. Grande A. The vitamin D3/Hox-A10 pathway supports MafB function during the monocyte differentiation of human CD34+ hemopoietic progenitors J. Immunol. 2008 181 5660 5672 10.4049/jimmunol.181.8.5660 18832725
29. Gemelli C. Martello A. Montanari M. Zanocco Marani T. Salsi V. Zappavigna V. Parenti S. Vignudelli T. Selmi T. Ferrari S. The Orosomucoid 1 protein is involved in the vitamin D - mediated macrophage de-activation process Exp. Cell Res. 2013 319 3201 3213 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.08.017 23973664
30. Amoui M. Suhr S.-M. Baylink D.J. Lau K.-H.W. An osteoclastic protein-tyrosine phosphatase may play a role in differentiation and activity of human monocytic U-937 cell-derived, osteoclast-like cells Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2004 287 C874 C884 10.1152/ajpcell.00294.2003 15355856
31. Takeda S. Yoshizawa T. Nagai Y. Yamato H. Fukumoto S. Sekine K. Kato S. Matsumoto T. Fujita T. Stimulation of osteoclast formation by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D requires its binding to vitamin D receptor (VDR) in osteoblastic cells: Studies using VDR knockout mice Endocrinology 1999 140 1005 1008 10.1210/endo.140.2.6673 9927335
32. Takahashi N. Maeda K. Ishihara A. Uehara S. Kobayashi Y. Regulatory mechanism of osteoclastogenesis by RANKL and Wnt signals Front. Biosci. Landmark Ed. 2011 16 21 30 10.2741/3673 21196156
33. Prince C.W. Butler W.T. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 regulates the biosynthesis of osteopontin, a bone-derived cell attachment protein, in clonal osteoblast-like osteosarcoma cells Coll. Relat. Res. 1987 7 305 313 10.1016/S0174-173X(87)80036-5 3478171
34. Reinholt F.P. Hultenby K. Oldberg A. Heinegard D. Osteopontin—A possible anchor of osteoclasts to bone Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1990 87 4473 4475 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4473 1693772 PMC54137
35. Abdallah D. Jourdain M.-L. Braux J. Guillaume C. Gangloff S.C. Jacquot J. Velard F. An Optimized Method to Generate Human Active Osteoclasts From Peripheral Blood Monocytes Front. Immunol. 2018 9 632 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00632 29670619 PMC5893639
36. Zarei A. Morovat A. Javaid K. Brown C.P. Vitamin D receptor expression in human bone tissue and dose-dependent activation in resorbing osteoclasts Bone Res. 2016 4 16030 10.1038/boneres.2016.30 27785371 PMC5057180
37. Starczak Y. Reinke D.C. Barratt K.R. Ryan J.W. Russell P.K. Clarke M.V. St-Arnaud R. Morris H.A. Davey R.A. Atkins G.J. Absence of vitamin D receptor in mature osteoclasts results in altered osteoclastic activity and bone loss J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2018 177 77 82 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2017.10.022 29107736
38. Ormsby R.T. Findlay D.M. Kogawa M. Anderson P.H. Morris H.A. Atkins G.J. Analysis of vitamin D metabolism gene expression in human bone: Evidence for autocrine control of bone remodelling J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2014 144 110 113 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2013.09.016 24120913
39. Amarasekara D.S. Yun H. Kim S. Lee N. Kim H. Rho J. Regulation of Osteoclast Differentiation by Cytokine Networks Immune Netw. 2018 18 10.4110/in.2018.18.e8 PMC5833125 29503739
40. Fukui S. Iwamoto N. Takatani A. Igawa T. Shimizu T. Umeda M. Nishino A. Horai Y. Hirai Y. Koga T. M1 and M2 Monocytes in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Contribution of Imbalance of M1/M2 Monocytes to Osteoclastogenesis Front. Immunol. 2018 8 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01958 PMC5766997 29375576
41. He D. Kou X. Luo Q. Yang R. Liu D. Wang X. Song Y. Cao H. Zeng M. Gan Y. Enhanced M1/M2 macrophage ratio promotes orthodontic root resorption J. Dent. Res. 2015 94 129 139 10.1177/0022034514553817 25344334
42. Yuan F.-L. Xu M.-H. Li X. Xinlong H. Fang W. Dong J. The Roles of Acidosis in Osteoclast Biology Front. Physiol. 2016 7 222 10.3389/fphys.2016.00222 27445831 PMC4919343
43. Park K.H. Park B. Yoon D.S. Kwon S.H. Shin D.M. Lee J.W. Lee H.G. Shim J.H. Park J.H. Lee J.M. Zinc inhibits osteoclast differentiation by suppression of Ca 2+ -Calcineurin-NFATc1 signaling pathway Cell Commun. Signal. 2013 11 10.1186/1478-811X-11-74 24088289 PMC3851046
44. Kenkre J.S. Bassett J.H.D. The bone remodelling cycle Ann. Clin. Biochem. 2018 55 308 327 10.1177/0004563218759371 29368538
45. Rodan G.A. Bone mass homeostasis and bisphosphonate action Bone 1997 20 1 4 10.1016/S8756-3282(96)00318-3 8988341
46. Gong L. Altman R.B. Klein T.E. Bisphosphonates pathway Pharmacogenet. Genomics 2011 21 50 53 10.1097/FPC.0b013e328335729c 20023594 PMC3086066
47. Kimmel D.B. Mechanism of Action, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profile, and Clinical Applications of Nitrogen-containing Bisphosphonates J. Dent. Res. 2007 86 1022 1033 10.1177/154405910708601102 17959891
48. Baron R. Ferrari S. Russell R.G.G. Denosumab and bisphosphonates: Different mechanisms of action and effects Bone 2011 48 677 692 10.1016/j.bone.2010.11.020 21145999
49. Marx R.E. Pamidronate (Aredia) and zoledronate (Zometa) induced avascular necrosis of the jaws: A growing epidemic J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2003 61 1115 1117 10.1016/S0278-2391(03)00720-1 12966493
50. Aghaloo T.L. Felsenfeld A.L. Tetradis S. Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in a Patient on Denosumab W.B. Saunders Philadelphia, PA, USA 2010 Volume 68 959 963 10.1016/j.joms.2009.10.010 PMC2880179 20149510
51. Pimolbutr K. Porter S. Fedele S. Osteonecrosis of the Jaw Associated with Antiangiogenics in Antiresorptive-Naïve Patient: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature Biomed Res. Int. 2018 2018 8071579 10.1155/2018/8071579 29850569 PMC5937620
52. Nicolatou-Galitis O. Kouri M. Papadopoulou E. Vardas E. Galiti D. Epstein J.B. Elad S. Campisi G. Tsoukalas N. Bektas-Kayhan K. Osteonecrosis of the jaw related to non-antiresorptive medications: A systematic review Support. Care Cancer 2019 27 383 394 10.1007/s00520-018-4501-x 30353228
53. Anderson K. Ismaila N. Flynn P.J. Halabi S. Jagannath S. Ogaily M.S. Omel J. Raje N. Roodman G.D. Yee G.C. Role of Bone-Modifying Agents in Multiple Myeloma: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update J. Clin. Oncol. 2018 36 812 818 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.6402 29341831
54. National Comprehensive Cancer Network National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines Available online: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx (accessed on 22 September 2019)
55. Gross C. Weber M. Creutzburg K. Möbius P. Preidl R. Amann K. Wehrhan F. Osteoclast profile of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw secondary to bisphosphonate therapy: A comparison with osteoradionecrosis and osteomyelitis J. Transl. Med. 2017 15 128 10.1186/s12967-017-1230-8 28587628 PMC5461625
56. Wehrhan F. Gross C. Creutzburg K. Amann K. Ries J. Kesting M. Geppert C.-I. Weber M. Osteoclastic expression of higher-level regulators NFATc1 and BCL6 in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw secondary to bisphosphonate therapy: A comparison with osteoradionecrosis and osteomyelitis J. Transl. Med. 2019 17 69 10.1186/s12967-019-1819-1 30832685 PMC6398259
57. Williams D.W. Lee C. Kim T. Yagita H. Wu H. Park S. Yang P. Liu H. Shi S. Shin K.-H. Impaired bone resorption and woven bone formation are associated with development of osteonecrosis of the jaw-like lesions by bisphosphonate and anti-receptor activator of NF-κB ligand antibody in mice Am. J. Pathol. 2014 184 3084 3093 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.07.010 25173134 PMC4215026
58. Kim J.-W. Alfafara A.M.D. Kim H.-Y. Kim S.-Y. Kim S.-J. Effects of pH alteration on the pathogenesis of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw Bone 2019 122 45 51 10.1016/j.bone.2019.02.007 30738857
59. Gong X. Yu W. Zhao H. Su J. Sheng Q. Skeletal Site-specific Effects of Zoledronate on in vivo Bone Remodeling and in vitro BMSCs Osteogenic Activity Sci. Rep. 2017 7 36129 10.1038/srep36129 28139685 PMC5282532
60. Cremers S. Drake M.T. Ebetino F.H. Bilezikian J.P. Russell R.G.G. Pharmacology of bisphosphonates Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2019 85 1052 1062 10.1111/bcp.13867 30650219 PMC6533426
61. Wen D. Qing L. Harrison G. Golub E. Akintoye S.O. Anatomic site variability in rat skeletal uptake and desorption of fluorescently labeled bisphosphonate Oral. Dis. 2011 17 427 432 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2010.01772.x 21122034 PMC3071450
62. Yamazaki T. Yamori M. Ishizaki T. Asai K. Goto K. Takahashi K. Nakayama T. Bessho K. Increased incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw after tooth extraction in patients treated with bisphosphonates: A cohort study Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2012 41 1397 1403 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.06.020 22840716
63. Chang J. Hakam A.E. McCauley L.K. Current Understanding of the Pathophysiology of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2018 16 584 595 10.1007/s11914-018-0474-4 30155844
64. Zhu W. Xu R. Du J. Fu Y. Li S. Zhang P. Liu L. Jiang H. Zoledronic acid promotes TLR-4-mediated M1 macrophage polarization in bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw FASEB J. 2019 33 5208 5219 10.1096/fj.201801791RR 30624969
65. Patntirapong S. Poolgesorn M. Alteration of macrophage viability, differentiation, and function by bisphosphonates Oral. Dis. 2018 24 1294 1302 10.1111/odi.12908 29869362
66. Wood J. Bonjean K. Ruetz S. Bellahcène A. Devy L. Foidart J.M. Castronovo V. Green J.R. Novel Antiangiogenic Effects of the Bisphosphonate Compound Zoledronic Acid J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2002 302 1055 1061 10.1124/jpet.102.035295 12183663
67. Allegra A. Innao V. Pulvirenti N. Musolino C. Antiresorptive Agents and Anti-Angiogenesis Drugs in the Development of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 2019 248 27 29 10.1620/tjem.248.27 31080196
68. Kün-Darbois J.-D. Libouban H. Mabilleau G. Pascaretti-Grizon F. Chappard D. Bone mineralization and vascularization in bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: An experimental study in the rat Clin. Oral. Investig. 2018 22 2997 3006 10.1007/s00784-018-2385-2 29453497
69. Soares M.Q.S. Van Dessel J. Jacobs R. da Silva Santos P.S. Cestari T.M. Garlet G.P. Duarte M.A.H. Imada T.S.N. Lambrichts I. Rubira-Bullen I.R.F. Zoledronic Acid Induces Site-Specific Structural Changes and Decreases Vascular Area in the Alveolar Bone J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2018 76 1893 1901 10.1016/j.joms.2018.03.007 29626448
70. Oteri G. Allegra A. Bellomo G. Alonci A. Nastro E. Penna G. Catalfamo L. Cicciù D. De Ponte F.S. Musolino C. Reduced serum levels of Interleukin 17 in patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw and in multiple myeloma subjects after bisphosphonates administration Cytokine 2008 43 103 104 10.1016/j.cyto.2008.05.010 18585926
71. Troeltzsch M. Woodlock T. Kriegelstein S. Steiner T. Messlinger K. Troeltzsch M. Physiology and pharmacology of nonbisphosphonate drugs implicated in osteonecrosis of the jaw J. Can. Dent. Assoc. 2012 78 c85 22985897
72. Ruggiero S.L. Dodson T.B. Fantasia J. Goodday R. Aghaloo T. Mehrotra B. O’Ryan F. American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Position Paper on Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw—2014 Update J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2014 72 1938 1956 10.1016/j.joms.2014.04.031 25234529
73. Cosman F. Crittenden D.B. Adachi J.D. Binkley N. Czerwinski E. Ferrari S. Hofbauer L.C. Lau E. Lewiecki E.M. Miyauchi A. Romosozumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis N. Engl. J. Med. 2016 375 1532 1543 10.1056/NEJMoa1607948 27641143
74. Khan A.A. Morrison A. Hanley D.A. Felsenberg D. McCauley L.K. O’Ryan F. Reid I.R. Ruggiero S.L. Taguchi A. Tetradis S. Diagnosis and Management of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Systematic Review and International Consensus J. Bone Miner. Res. 2015 30 3 23 10.1002/jbmr.2405 25414052
75. Fedele S. Bedogni G. Scoletta M. Favia G. Colella G. Agrillo A. Bettini G. Di Fede O. Oteri G. Fusco V. Up to a quarter of patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw associated with antiresorptive agents remain undiagnosed Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2015 53 13 17 10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.09.001 25282593
76. Khan A. Morrison A. Cheung A. Hashem W. Compston J. Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ): Diagnosis and management in 2015 Osteoporos. Int. 2016 27 853 859 10.1007/s00198-015-3335-3 26493811
77. Fliefel R. Tröltzsch M. Kühnisch J. Ehrenfeld M. Otto S. Treatment strategies and outcomes of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) with characterization of patients: A systematic review Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2015 44 568 585 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.01.026 25726090
78. Otto S. Tröltzsch M. Jambrovic V. Panya S. Probst F. Ristow O. Ehrenfeld M. Pautke C. Tooth extraction in patients receiving oral or intravenous bisphosphonate administration: A trigger for BRONJ development? J. Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg. 2015 43 847 854 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.03.039 25958767
79. Panya S. Fliefel R. Probst F. Tröltzsch M. Ehrenfeld M. Schubert S. Otto S. Role of microbiological culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of actinomyces in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) J. Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg. 2017 45 357 363 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.01.006 28162845
80. Schiodt M. Otto S. Fedele S. Bedogni A. Nicolatou-Galitis O. Guggenberger R. Herlofson B.B. Ristow O. Kofod T. Workshop of European task force on medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw—Current challenges Oral Dis. 2019 10.1111/odi.13160 31325201
81. Schiodt M. Reibel J. Oturai P. Kofod T. Comparison of nonexposed and exposed bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis of the jaws: A retrospective analysis from the Copenhagen cohort and a proposal for an updated classification system Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 2014 117 204 213 10.1016/j.oooo.2013.10.010 24332520
82. Bedogni A. Blandamura S. Lokmic Z. Palumbo C. Ragazzo M. Ferrari F. Tregnaghi A. Pietrogrande F. Procopio O. Saia G. Bisphosphonate-associated jawbone osteonecrosis: A correlation between imaging techniques and histopathology Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endodontol. 2008 105 358 364 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.08.040 18280968
83. Fedele S. Porter S.R. D’Aiuto F. Aljohani S. Vescovi P. Manfredi M. Arduino P.G. Broccoletti R. Musciotto A. Di Fede O. Nonexposed Variant of Bisphosphonate-associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Case Series Am. J. Med. 2010 123 1060 1064 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.04.033 20851366
84. Bedogni A. Saia G. Bettini G. Tronchet A. Totola A. Bedogni G. Tregnago P. Valenti M.T. Bertoldo F. Ferronato G. Osteomalacia: The missing link in the pathogenesis of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws? Oncologist 2012 17 1114 1119 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0141 22723507 PMC3425530
85. Priemel M. von Domarus C. Klatte T.O. Kessler S. Schlie J. Meier S. Proksch N. Pastor F. Netter C. Streichert T. Bone mineralization defects and vitamin D deficiency: Histomorphometric analysis of iliac crest bone biopsies and circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D in 675 patients J. Bone Miner. Res. 2010 25 305 312 10.1359/jbmr.090728 19594303
86. Holick M.F. Vitamin D deficiency N. Engl. J. Med. 2007 357 266 281 10.1056/NEJMra070553 17634462
87. Bedogni A. Bettini G. Bedogni G. Basso D. Gatti D. Valisena S. Brunello A. Sorio M. Berno T. Giannini S. Is vitamin D deficiency a risk factor for osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with cancer? A matched case–control study J. Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg. 2019 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.03.007 30929994
88. De Molon R.S. Shimamoto H. Bezouglaia O. Pirih F.Q. Dry S.M. Kostenuik P. Boyce R.W. Dwyer D. Aghaloo T.L. Tetradis S. OPG-Fc but Not Zoledronic Acid Discontinuation Reverses Osteonecrosis of the Jaws (ONJ) in Mice J. Bone Miner. Res. 2015 30 1627 1640 10.1002/jbmr.2490 25727550 PMC4995600
89. Otto S. Baumann S. Ehrenfeld M. Pautke C. Successful surgical management of osteonecrosis of the jaw due to RANK-ligand inhibitor treatment using fluorescence guided bone resection J. Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg. 2013 41 694 698 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.05.038 23830772
90. Rupel K. Ottaviani G. Gobbo M. Contardo L. Tirelli G. Vescovi P. Di Lenarda R. Biasotto M. A systematic review of therapeutical approaches in bisphosphonates-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) Oral Oncol. 2014 50 1049 1057 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.08.016 25240948
91. Hayashida S. Soutome S. Yanamoto S. Fujita S. Hasegawa T. Komori T. Kojima Y. Miyamoto H. Shibuya Y. Ueda N. Evaluation of the Treatment Strategies for Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws (MRONJ) and the Factors Affecting Treatment Outcome: A Multicenter Retrospective Study with Propensity Score Matching Analysis J. Bone Miner. Res. 2017 32 2022 2029 10.1002/jbmr.3191 28585700
92. Bedogni A. Saia G. Bettini G. Tronchet A. Totola A. Bedogni G. Ferronato G. Nocini P.F. Blandamura S. Long-term outcomes of surgical resection of the jaws in cancer patients with bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis Oral Oncol. 2011 47 420 424 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2011.02.024 21439892
93. Otto S. Ristow O. Pache C. Troeltzsch M. Fliefel R. Ehrenfeld M. Pautke C. Fluorescence-guided surgery for the treatment of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: A prospective cohort study J. Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg. 2016 44 1073 1080 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.05.018 27263757
94. Stockmann P. Hinkmann F.M. Lell M.M. Fenner M. Vairaktaris E. Neukam F.-W. Nkenke E. Panoramic radiograph, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Which imaging technique should be preferred in bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw? A prospective clinical study Clin. Oral Investig. 2010 14 311 317 10.1007/s00784-009-0293-1 19513765
95. Hutchinson M. O’Ryan F. Chavez V. Lathon P.V. Sanchez G. Hatcher D.C. Indresano A.T. Lo J.C. Radiographic Findings in Bisphosphonate-Treated Patients With Stage 0 Disease in the Absence of Bone Exposure J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2010 68 2232 2240 10.1016/j.joms.2010.05.003 20728032
96. Bedogni A. Fedele S. Bedogni G. Scoletta M. Favia G. Colella G. Agrillo A. Bettini G. Di Fede O. Oteri G. Staging of osteonecrosis of the jaw requires computed tomography for accurate definition of the extent of bony disease Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2014 52 603 608 10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.04.009 24856927
97. Anesi A. Ferretti M. Cavani F. Salvatori R. Bianchi M. Russo A. Chiarini L. Palumbo C. Structural and ultrastructural analyses of bone regeneration in rabbit cranial osteotomy: Piezosurgery versus traditional osteotomes J. Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg. 2018 46 107 118 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.10.004 29128150
98. Pozzi S. Anesi A. Generali L. Bari A. Consolo U. Chiarini L. Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (BRONJ) Complications in Endodontic Surgery Tsesis I. Springer Berlin Heidelberg Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany 2014 153 165
99. Salgarelli A.C. Bellini P. Magnoni C. Anesi A. Collini M. Synergistic use of local flaps for total lower lip reconstruction Dermatologic Surg. 2011 37 1666 1670 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02151.x 22092975
100. Anesi A. Negrello S. Chiarini L. Evolution in Indication Springer International Publishing Cham, Switzerland 2019 69 79
101. Chiarini L. Anesi A. Negrello S. Mandible: Lateral, Hemimandibular, Anterior Springer International Publishing Cham, Switzerland 2019 27 38
102. Bedogni A. Anesi A. Fior A. Bettini G. Nocini P. Microsurgical reconstruction of the mandible in a patient with Evans Syndrome: A case report and review of the literature J. Reconstr. Microsurg. 2013 29 545 550 23804021 10.1055/s-0033-1348898
103. Bellucci D. Salvatori R. Cannio M. Luginina M. Orrù R. Montinaro S. Anesi A. Chiarini L. Cao G. Cannillo V. Bioglass and bioceramic composites processed by Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS): Biological evaluation Versus SBF test Biomed. Glas. 2018 4 21 31 10.1515/bglass-2018-0003
104. Bellucci D. Salvatori R. Anesi A. Chiarini L. Cannillo V. SBF assays, direct and indirect cell culture tests to evaluate the biological performance of bioglasses and bioglass-based composites: Three paradigmatic cases Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019 96 757 764 10.1016/j.msec.2018.12.006 30606588
105. Nocini P.F. Anesi A. Fior A. Bone Augmentation Atlas of Mandibular and Maxillary Reconstruction with the Fibula Flap Springer International Publishing Cham, Switzerland 2019 53 65
106. Bellucci D. Anesi A. Salvatori R. Chiarini L. Cannillo V. A comparative in vivo evaluation of bioactive glasses and bioactive glass-based composites for bone tissue repair Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017 79 286 295 10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.062 28629020
107. Bellucci D. Cannillo V. Anesi A. Salvatori R. Chiarini L. Manfredini T. Zaffe D. Bone Regeneration by Novel Bioactive Glasses Containing Strontium and/or Magnesium: A Preliminary In-Vivo Study Materials 2018 11 2223 10.3390/ma11112223 30413108 PMC6266095
108. Bellucci D. Salvatori R. Giannatiempo J. Anesi A. Bortolini S. Cannillo V. A New Bioactive Glass/Collagen Hybrid Composite for Applications in Dentistry Materials 2019 12 2079 10.3390/ma12132079 31261615 PMC6651877
109. Malavasi G. Salvatori R. Zambon A. Lusvardi G. Rigamonti L. Chiarini L. Anesi A. Cytocompatibility of potential bioactive cerium-doped glasses based on 45S5 Materials 2019 12 594 10.3390/ma12040594 PMC6416737 30781522
110. Giannone N. Anesi A. Ciavarella D. La Torretta G. Di Liberto C. Cyanoacrylate in oral surgery | I cianoacrilati in chirurgia orale Ital. Oral Surg. 2008 7 23 27
111. Di Nisio C. Zizzari V.L. Zara S. Falconi M. Teti G. Tetè G. Nori A. Zavaglia V. Cataldi A. RANK/RANKL/OPG signaling pathways in necrotic jaw bone from bisphosphonate-treated subjects Eur. J. Histochem. 2015 59 2455 10.4081/ejh.2015.2455 25820558 PMC4378212