Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016
Evaluation of a modified knee rotation angle in MRI scans with and without trochlear dysplasia: a parameter independent of knee size and trochlear morphology.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dornacher Daniel, Trubrich Angela, Guelke Joachim, Reichel Heiko, Kappe Thomas
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Regarding TT-TG in knee realignment surgery, two aspects have to be considered: first, there might be flaws in using absolute values for TT-TG, ignoring the knee size of the individual. Second, in high-grade trochlear dysplasia with a dome-shaped trochlea, measurement of TT-TG has proven to lack precision and reliability. The purpose of this examination was to establish a knee rotation angle, independent of the size of the individual knee and unaffected by a dysplastic trochlea.
METHODS: A total of 114 consecutive MRI scans of knee joints were analysed by two observers, retrospectively. Of these, 59 were obtained from patients with trochlear dysplasia, and another 55 were obtained from patients presenting with a different pathology of the knee joint. Trochlear dysplasia was classified into low grade and high grade. TT-TG was measured according to the method described by Schoettle et al. In addition, a modified knee rotation angle was assessed. Interobserver reliability of the knee rotation angle and its correlation with TT-TG was calculated.
RESULTS: The knee rotation angle showed good correlation with TT-TG in the readings of observer 1 and observer 2. Interobserver correlation of the parameter showed excellent values for the scans with normal trochlea, low-grade and high-grade trochlear dysplasia, respectively. All calculations were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The knee rotation angle might meet the requirements for precise diagnostics in knee realignment surgery. Unlike TT-TG, this parameter seems not to be affected by a dysplastic trochlea. In addition, the dimensionless parameter is independent of the knee size of the individual.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
METHODS: A total of 114 consecutive MRI scans of knee joints were analysed by two observers, retrospectively. Of these, 59 were obtained from patients with trochlear dysplasia, and another 55 were obtained from patients presenting with a different pathology of the knee joint. Trochlear dysplasia was classified into low grade and high grade. TT-TG was measured according to the method described by Schoettle et al. In addition, a modified knee rotation angle was assessed. Interobserver reliability of the knee rotation angle and its correlation with TT-TG was calculated.
RESULTS: The knee rotation angle showed good correlation with TT-TG in the readings of observer 1 and observer 2. Interobserver correlation of the parameter showed excellent values for the scans with normal trochlea, low-grade and high-grade trochlear dysplasia, respectively. All calculations were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The knee rotation angle might meet the requirements for precise diagnostics in knee realignment surgery. Unlike TT-TG, this parameter seems not to be affected by a dysplastic trochlea. In addition, the dimensionless parameter is independent of the knee size of the individual.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.