MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.injury.2025.112320

Медицинская библиотека · Injury · 2025

A comparison of anterior ring fixation constructs in Young-Burgess lateral compression type 2 and 3 (LC2, LC3; AO/OTA 61-B2/B3) pelvic ring injuries: does fixation matter?

Hoskins Wayne, Gusho Charles, Haase Douglas, Milby Josh, Crist Brett, Della Rocca Gregory J, Schweser Kyle, Stannard James P, Parola Rown, Bravin Daniel

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes of lateral compression LC2 and LC3 pelvic ring injuries when posterior ring fixation is applied and different anterior ring constructs are used.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis from two Academic Level I Trauma Centers of all operatively treated LC2 and LC3 (AO/OTA 61-B2/B3) pelvic ring injuries from January 2019-January 2024. A comparison of anterior ring constructs was made: no fixation vs. fixation; indirect fixation (external fixators and InFix)) vs. internal fixation; long vs. short percutaneous screws. Long percutaneous screws were defined as either bicortical bypassing all 3 Nakatani zones or bypassing the fracture by 2 Nakatani zones with intramedullary juxtacortical or bicortical finishing. A short screw was defined as all other screws, regardless of direction. Primary outcome measure was >1 cm of pelvic ring displacement from post-operative to final radiographs showing fracture healing with sufficient callus. Secondary outcomes were unplanned major reoperation, removal of implants or non-union repair, and other surgical complications.

RESULTS

67 patients met inclusion criteria. Most were female (n = 35, 52 %), mean age was 48.3 (SD 21.7) and most injuries were LC3 (n = 39, 58 %). All cases had posterior ring fixation. Twelve (18 %) had no anterior ring fixation and there was a statistically higher rate of deformity compared with patients with anterior ring fixation (n = 55, 82 %) (58 % vs. 16 %, p = 0.005). Indirect fixation (n = 12, 18 %) had a statistically higher rate of deformity compared with internal fixation (n = 43, 64 %) (50 % vs. 7 %, p = 0.002). There was a statistically higher rate of deformity when a short percutaneous screw (n = 6, 9 %) rather than long screw was used (n = 26, 39 %) (50 % vs. 0 %, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Routine anterior ring fixation in conjunction with posterior ring fixation is strongly encouraged for LC2 and LC3 injuries. A long percutaneously-applied anterior screw provides optimal stability to maintain reduction and prevent deformity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level 3.

Для цитирования: Hoskins Wayne, Gusho Charles, Haase Douglas, Milby Josh, Crist Brett, Della Rocca Gregory J, Schweser Kyle, Stannard James P, Parola Rown, Bravin Daniel. A comparison of anterior ring fixation constructs in Young-Burgess lateral compression type 2 and 3 (LC2, LC3; AO/OTA 61-B2/B3) pelvic ring injuries: does fixation matter?. Injury. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2025.112320.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.