MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00007632-199911010-00016

Медицинская библиотека · Spine · 1999

Microdecompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.

Weiner B K, Walker M, Brower R S, McCulloch J A

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

A description of the technique for lumbar microdecompression and a prospective study of the outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To describe and analyze a technique that affords an excellent decompression while minimizing damage to surrounding tissues.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Commonly used techniques of lumbar decompression that include bilateral takedown of paraspinal musculature and aggressive bony resection can result in significant iatrogenic sequelae. A less destructive alternative is needed.

METHODS

Unilateral limited takedown of multifidus was undertaken, and ipsilateral decompression performed. The contralateral side then was addressed under the midline structures with microscopic visualization--thereby preserving the supra-/interspinous ligament complex and the contralateral musculature. Thirty consecutive patients undergoing the procedure were analyzed prospectively and after a follow-up period by independent observers using a modified validated functional outcome score and patient satisfaction measures.

RESULTS

The technique affords an excellent decompression while minimizing destruction to tissues not directly involved in the pathologic process. Functional outcome scores doubled, and 87% of patients reported high satisfaction rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Lumbar microdecompression is a minimally invasive technique that appears to provide excellent functional outcomes.

Для цитирования: Weiner B K, Walker M, Brower R S, McCulloch J A. Microdecompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.. Spine. 1999. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199911010-00016.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.