MedElevator
Войти в исследования Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024
Clinical significance of posterior talofibular ligament injury in chronic lateral ankle instability.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nakasa Tomoyuki, Ikuta Yasunari, Kawabata Shingo, Sakurai Satoru, Moriwaki Dan, Ishibashi Saori, Silan Asyumaredha Asril, Adachi Nobuo
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Although arthroscopic repair of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) is widely performed, the effect of posterior talofibular ligament (PTFL) injury on clinical outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of the PTFL in chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI) and determine whether the presence or absence of PTFL injury affected the postoperative outcomes of arthroscopic ATFL repair.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty ankles of 35 patients who underwent arthroscopic repair for CLAI were included in this study as the experimental group, together with 25 ankles of 24 patients without CLAI as the control group. The PTFL thickness (PTFLT) and PTFL cross-sectional area (PTFLCSA) were measured using MRI and compared between the control and CLAI groups. The clinical outcomes of arthroscopic repair were compared between ankles with and without PTFL injuries.
RESULTS: The mean PTFLT and PTFLCSA values were significantly higher in the CLAI group than in the control group. The PTFLT and PTFLCSA in the PTFL injury group were significantly larger than those in the non-injury group in the CLAI group. Postoperatively, there were no significant differences in clinical scores and talar tilt angles on stress radiographs between ankles with and without PTFL injury; however, instability recurrence was frequently observed in ankles with PTFL injury (32.1%) compared to the ankles without PTFL injury (16.7%). Poor-quality ATFL remnant, ATFL inferior fascicle, and calcaneofibular ligament injuries were frequently observed in ankles with PTFL injuries.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that PTFL injury is highly associated with CLAI but it does not affect postoperative clinical scores. However, postoperative instability recurrence was more often observed in ankles with PTFL injuries, given that they frequently have poor-quality ATFL remnants and CFL injuries.
EVIDENCE LEVEL: Level III.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty ankles of 35 patients who underwent arthroscopic repair for CLAI were included in this study as the experimental group, together with 25 ankles of 24 patients without CLAI as the control group. The PTFL thickness (PTFLT) and PTFL cross-sectional area (PTFLCSA) were measured using MRI and compared between the control and CLAI groups. The clinical outcomes of arthroscopic repair were compared between ankles with and without PTFL injuries.
RESULTS: The mean PTFLT and PTFLCSA values were significantly higher in the CLAI group than in the control group. The PTFLT and PTFLCSA in the PTFL injury group were significantly larger than those in the non-injury group in the CLAI group. Postoperatively, there were no significant differences in clinical scores and talar tilt angles on stress radiographs between ankles with and without PTFL injury; however, instability recurrence was frequently observed in ankles with PTFL injury (32.1%) compared to the ankles without PTFL injury (16.7%). Poor-quality ATFL remnant, ATFL inferior fascicle, and calcaneofibular ligament injuries were frequently observed in ankles with PTFL injuries.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that PTFL injury is highly associated with CLAI but it does not affect postoperative clinical scores. However, postoperative instability recurrence was more often observed in ankles with PTFL injuries, given that they frequently have poor-quality ATFL remnants and CFL injuries.
EVIDENCE LEVEL: Level III.