The Journal of arthroplasty · 2020
The Impact of Transitioning From International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision to International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision on Reported Complication Rates Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bedard Nicholas A, Carender Christopher N, DeMik David E, Browne James A, Schwarzkopf Ran, Callaghan John J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In 2015, the healthcare system transitioned from International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) coding to the Tenth Revision (ICD-10). We sought to determine the effect of this change on the reported incidence of complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
METHODS: The Humana administrative claims database was queried from 2 years prior to October 1, 2015 (ICD-9 cohort) and for 1 year after this date (ICD-10 cohort) to identify all TKA procedures. Complications occurring within 6 months of surgery were captured using the respective coding systems. Incidence of each complication was compared between cohorts using risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS: There were 19,009 TKAs in the ICD-10 cohort and 38,172 TKAs in the ICD-9 cohort. The incidence of each complication analyzed was significantly higher in the ICD-9 cohort relative to the ICD-10 cohort. Periprosthetic joint infection occurred in 1.9% vs 1.3% (RR 1.5, 1.3-1.9), loosening in 0.3% vs 0.1% (RR 2.7, 1.8-4.9), periprosthetic fracture in 0.3% vs 0.1% (RR 3.0, 1.6-4.5), and other mechanical complications in 0.7% vs 0.4% (RR 2.0, 1.5-2.5) (P < .05 for all).
CONCLUSION: The transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10 coding has altered the reported incidence of complications following TKA. These results are likely due to the added complexity of ICD-10 which is joint and laterality specific. It is important to understand the differences between coding systems as this data is used for quality initiatives, risk adjustment models, and clinical research. Thoughtful methodology will be necessary when ICD-9 and ICD-10 data are being analyzed simultaneously.
METHODS: The Humana administrative claims database was queried from 2 years prior to October 1, 2015 (ICD-9 cohort) and for 1 year after this date (ICD-10 cohort) to identify all TKA procedures. Complications occurring within 6 months of surgery were captured using the respective coding systems. Incidence of each complication was compared between cohorts using risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS: There were 19,009 TKAs in the ICD-10 cohort and 38,172 TKAs in the ICD-9 cohort. The incidence of each complication analyzed was significantly higher in the ICD-9 cohort relative to the ICD-10 cohort. Periprosthetic joint infection occurred in 1.9% vs 1.3% (RR 1.5, 1.3-1.9), loosening in 0.3% vs 0.1% (RR 2.7, 1.8-4.9), periprosthetic fracture in 0.3% vs 0.1% (RR 3.0, 1.6-4.5), and other mechanical complications in 0.7% vs 0.4% (RR 2.0, 1.5-2.5) (P < .05 for all).
CONCLUSION: The transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10 coding has altered the reported incidence of complications following TKA. These results are likely due to the added complexity of ICD-10 which is joint and laterality specific. It is important to understand the differences between coding systems as this data is used for quality initiatives, risk adjustment models, and clinical research. Thoughtful methodology will be necessary when ICD-9 and ICD-10 data are being analyzed simultaneously.