Indian dermatology online journal · 2022
Clinical Significance of Myositis-Specific and Myositis-Associated Antibody Profiles in Dermatomyositis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Babu Anuradha K, Mizaj Z, Thomas Joe, Chacko Manas
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSA) and myositis-associated autoantibodies (MAA) are clinically useful biomarkers that point to the diagnosis, clinical manifestations, and prognosis of dermatomyositis (DM).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: To estimate the prevalence of MSA as well as MAA and analyze possible clinical correlations of these autoantibodies in patients diagnosed with DM, we conducted a cross-sectional study of 30 patients who were diagnosed with DM.
RESULTS: MSA were positive in 19 patients (63%) in which Mi 2 was positive in 8 (27%) patients, and this was the most frequently found MSA. A total of 11 (36.7%) patients showed positive MAA. AntiPM/Scl 75 and anti-Ro 52 were positive in 5 (16.7%) patients each and these were the most commonly found MAA. Anti-La was absent in all our patients. There were 8 (27%) patients in whom both MSA and MAA were positive. Either MSA and/or MAA were positive in 22 (73%) patients. On a bivariate analysis, the patients who were positive for anti-PM/Scl 75 showed a significant difference in manifesting cutaneous ulcers (P value 0.023). It was also found that anti-SAE-positive patients showed a significant difference with malignancy (P value 0.014). Anti-Ro 52-positive patients were less likely to have symmetrical proximal muscle weakness (P value 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: All patients who were anti-MDA 5 positive had myositis and none of the anti-MDA 5-positive patients had rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RPILD). More than one MSA in the same patient was noted in three patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: To estimate the prevalence of MSA as well as MAA and analyze possible clinical correlations of these autoantibodies in patients diagnosed with DM, we conducted a cross-sectional study of 30 patients who were diagnosed with DM.
RESULTS: MSA were positive in 19 patients (63%) in which Mi 2 was positive in 8 (27%) patients, and this was the most frequently found MSA. A total of 11 (36.7%) patients showed positive MAA. AntiPM/Scl 75 and anti-Ro 52 were positive in 5 (16.7%) patients each and these were the most commonly found MAA. Anti-La was absent in all our patients. There were 8 (27%) patients in whom both MSA and MAA were positive. Either MSA and/or MAA were positive in 22 (73%) patients. On a bivariate analysis, the patients who were positive for anti-PM/Scl 75 showed a significant difference in manifesting cutaneous ulcers (P value 0.023). It was also found that anti-SAE-positive patients showed a significant difference with malignancy (P value 0.014). Anti-Ro 52-positive patients were less likely to have symmetrical proximal muscle weakness (P value 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: All patients who were anti-MDA 5 positive had myositis and none of the anti-MDA 5-positive patients had rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RPILD). More than one MSA in the same patient was noted in three patients.