DOI 10.1097/phm.0000000000002639
Outcomes of Proprioceptive Training on Recovery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
The study was designed to explore the effect of proprioceptive training in contrast to conventional training among individuals after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. It includes joint position sense, subjective functional outcomes (Cincinnati, Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, International Knee Documentation Committee knee form), muscle strength, pain, and kinesthesia.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched. Quality assessment was performed through the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and GRADE system. The standardized mean deviation was selected as the effect size.
RESULTS
Fifteen studies and 537 participants were included. Compared with conventional training, proprioceptive training may significantly enhance passive joint position sense (standardized mean deviation = -1.87 [95% CI = -2.39 to -1.34]) and single-leg hop function test performance (standardized mean deviation = 0.29 [95% CI = 0.04 to 0.54]). Data also indicated that proprioceptive training can moderately improve subjective functional outcomes (standardized mean deviation = 0.61 [95% CI = 0.23 to 0.99]). However, there were no significant effects on active joint position sense, muscle strength, and visual analogue scale.
CONCLUSIONS
Proprioceptive training has the potential to yield beneficial effects on knee passive joint position sense, hop functional test, and subjective functional outcomes in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. However, its impact on enhancing knee active joint position sense and kinesthesia may not be statistically significant.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.