MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/0100-3984.2014.0068

Медицинская библиотека · Radiologia brasileira · 2015

Magnetic resonance imaging and BMB score in the evaluation of bone involvement in Gaucher's disease patients.

de Mello Ricardo Andrade Fernandes, Mello Melissa Bozzi Nonato, Pessanha Laís Bastos

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate by magnetic resonance imaging changes in bone marrow of patients undergoing treatment for type I Gaucher's disease.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Descriptive, cross-sectional study of Gaucher's disease patients submitted to 3 T magnetic resonance imaging of femurs and lumbar spine. The images were blindly reviewed and the findings were classified according to the semiquantitative bone marrow burden (BMB) scoring system.

RESULTS

All of the seven evaluated patients (three men and four women) presented signs of bone marrow infiltration. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head was found in three patients, Erlenmeyer flask deformity in five, and no patient had vertebral body collapse. The mean BMB score was 11, ranging from 9 to 14.

CONCLUSION

Magnetic resonance imaging is currently the method of choice for assessing bone involvement in Gaucher's disease in adults due to its high sensitivity to detect both focal and diffuse bone marrow changes, and the BMB score is a simplified method for semiquantitative analysis, without depending on advanced sequences or sophisticated hardware, allowing for the classification of the disease extent and assisting in the treatment monitoring.

Для цитирования: de Mello Ricardo Andrade Fernandes, Mello Melissa Bozzi Nonato, Pessanha Laís Bastos. Magnetic resonance imaging and BMB score in the evaluation of bone involvement in Gaucher's disease patients.. Radiologia brasileira. 2015. DOI: 10.1590/0100-3984.2014.0068.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.