BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026
Outcome analysis of conservative treatment of a distal radius fracture with OPTIVOhand orthosis versus plaster cast: a randomized controlled trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Friederich Maximilian, Brunner Julia, Kirsch Elke, Stuby Fabian, Zimmermann Alexander, Histing Tina, Hemmann Philipp
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Distal radius fractures (DRF) are often immobilized using a conventional plaster cast although orthoses offer a time- and resource-saving alternative. This prospective randomized study compared the conservative DRF treatment using an orthosis (OPTIVOhand®) with plaster cast immobilization. Besides the maintenance of reduction result (primary endpoint), functional and subjective outcomes (secondary endpoints) were examined.
METHODS/ DESIGN: 53 patients with isolated DRF were randomized to the orthosis group (OG) or the control group (CG). The follow-up examinations included radiological, clinical, and functional evaluations (ROM, grip strength, DASH score, SF-36) as well as patient satisfaction questionnaire.
RESULTS: 41 of the 53 patients included (OG: n = 21, CG: n = 20) were followed up until the 12 months follow-up. The rate of secondary dislocations was comparable in both groups (OG: n = 3; CG: n = 2; p > 0.05). Additionally, the OG showed significantly (p < 0.05) better subjective function (DASH score) 6 weeks and 3 months after injury, and a higher quality of life (SF-36 physical component summary) at 2 and 6 week follow-up. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in OG and mean application time was significantly shorter (OG: 02:35 min vs. CG: 07:35 min; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: This study's functional and radiological results on conservative DRF treatment did not reveal a significant difference in maintenance of reduction result between modern orthoses and conventional plaster casts, while achieving higher patient satisfaction. Hence, orthoses offer a good alternative to plaster casts, especially for stable fracture types.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, Identifier: DRKS00017695. Trial registration date 04.11.2019, ( https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00017695 ).
METHODS/ DESIGN: 53 patients with isolated DRF were randomized to the orthosis group (OG) or the control group (CG). The follow-up examinations included radiological, clinical, and functional evaluations (ROM, grip strength, DASH score, SF-36) as well as patient satisfaction questionnaire.
RESULTS: 41 of the 53 patients included (OG: n = 21, CG: n = 20) were followed up until the 12 months follow-up. The rate of secondary dislocations was comparable in both groups (OG: n = 3; CG: n = 2; p > 0.05). Additionally, the OG showed significantly (p < 0.05) better subjective function (DASH score) 6 weeks and 3 months after injury, and a higher quality of life (SF-36 physical component summary) at 2 and 6 week follow-up. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in OG and mean application time was significantly shorter (OG: 02:35 min vs. CG: 07:35 min; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: This study's functional and radiological results on conservative DRF treatment did not reveal a significant difference in maintenance of reduction result between modern orthoses and conventional plaster casts, while achieving higher patient satisfaction. Hence, orthoses offer a good alternative to plaster casts, especially for stable fracture types.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, Identifier: DRKS00017695. Trial registration date 04.11.2019, ( https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00017695 ).